Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumors in the EURO‐E.W.I.N.G. 99 clinical trial

Juergens, Christine, Weston, Claire, Lewis, Ian, Whelan, Jeremy, Paulussen, Michael, Oberlin, Odile, Michon, Jean, Zoubek, Andreas, Juergens, Herbert, Craft, Alan·2006·Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract

Background: The EUROpean Ewing tumour Working Initiative of National Groups 1999 (EURO‐E.W.I.N.G. 99) protocol prescribes six courses of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) as intensive induction chemotherapy for Ewing tumors (ET). Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) is recommended. Adverse reactions (AR) were evaluated; quality assurance of data collection reviewed. Procedure: Safety data from 4,746 courses of VIDE in 851 patients less than 50 years with ET were collected using a checklist and evaluated using descriptive statistics with sub‐groups including gender, age, and tumor volume, analyzed by Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: Myelosuppression and infections were the major AR but with appropriate supportive therapy targeted dose intensity was maintained. Five VIDE‐related deaths with three due to sepsis were reported. Renal and cardiac toxicity were reflected by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <39 ml/min/1.73m 2 in 0.1%, tubular phosphate reabsorption ≤0.80 in 1.9%, and left ventricular shortening fracture <28% in 2.5% VIDE courses. Statistically significant gender‐associated AR concerning hemoglobin and platelets were observed with females > males as were age‐associated AR concerning hemoglobin, WBC, platelets, stomatitis, and vomiting with AR decreasing with age, that is, children > adolescents > adults. No association of AR to tumor volume was found. In VIDE courses with and without G‐CSF, neutropenia‐related fever in 60.8% and 65.8%, and infection in 54.7% and 61.0% courses, respectively, were recorded. Conclusions: AR under VIDE remained within the expected range. Some AR, for example, hematotoxicity were significantly influenced by age and gender but not by tumor volume. G‐CSF did not significantly influence neutropenia‐related fever and infection. Solicited safety collection with checklists adequately reflects the burden per course. Pediatr Blood Cancer © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pbc.20820

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Juergens, C., Weston, C., Lewis, I., Whelan, J., Paulussen, M., Oberlin, O., Michon, J., Zoubek, A., Juergens, H., & Craft, A.
Venue
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-29
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
22-29
ISSN
  • 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5017
OpenAlex
W1963882854
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumors in the EURO‐E.W.I.N.G. 99 clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pbc.20820
The paper
Juergens, C., Weston, C., Lewis, I., Whelan, J., Paulussen, M., Oberlin, O., Michon, J., Zoubek, A., Juergens, H., & Craft, A. (2006). Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumors in the EURO‐E.W.I.N.G. 99 clinical trial. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20820

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.