Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bone Cancer, Version 2.2017

Open access
Biermann, J. Sybil, Chow, Warren, Reed, Damon R., Lucas, David, Adkins, Douglas R., Agulnik, Mark, Benjamin, Robert S., Brigman, Brian, Budd, G. Thomas, Curry, William T., Didwania, Aarati, Fabbri, Nicola, Hornicek, Francis J., Kuechle, Joseph B., Lindskog, Dieter, Mayerson, Joel, McGarry, Sean V., Million, Lynn, Morris, Carol D., Movva, Sujana, O'Donnell, Richard J., Randall, R. Lor, Rose, Peter, Santana, Victor M., Satcher, Robert L., Schwartz, Herbert, Siegel, Herrick J., Thornton, Katherine, Villalobos, Victor, Bergman, Mary Anne, Scavone, Jillian L.·2017·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ® ) are a statement of consensus of the authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment.The NCCN Guidelines ® Insights highlight important changes to the NCCN Guidelines ® recommendations from previous versions.Colored markings in the algorithm show changes and the discussion aims to further the understanding of these changes by summarizing salient portions of the NCCN Guideline Panel discussion, including the literature reviewed.These NCCN Guidelines Insights do not represent the full NCCN Guidelines; further, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ® (NCCN ® ) makes no representation or warranties of any kind regarding the content, use, or application of the NCCN Guidelines and NCCN Guidelines Insights and disclaims any responsibility for their applications or use in any way.The full and most current version of these NCCN Guidelines are available at NCCN.org.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0017

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Biermann, J. S., Chow, W., Reed, D. R., Lucas, D., Adkins, D. R., Agulnik, M., Benjamin, R. S., Brigman, B., Budd, G. T., Curry, W. T., Didwania, A., Fabbri, N., Hornicek, F. J., Kuechle, J. B., Lindskog, D., Mayerson, J., McGarry, S. V., Million, L., Morris, C. D., Movva, S., O'Donnell, R. J., Randall, R. L., Rose, P., Santana, V. M., Satcher, R. L., Schwartz, H., Siegel, H. J., Thornton, K., Villalobos, V., Bergman, M. A., & Scavone, J. L.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2017-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
155-167
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W2594071156
Cited by
294
References
51
FWCI
21.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bone Cancer, Version 2.2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0017
The paper
Biermann, J. S., Chow, W., Reed, D. R., Lucas, D., Adkins, D. R., Agulnik, M., Benjamin, R. S., Brigman, B., Budd, G. T., Curry, W. T., Didwania, A., Fabbri, N., Hornicek, F. J., Kuechle, J. B., Lindskog, D., Mayerson, J., McGarry, S. V., Million, L., Morris, C. D., . . . Scavone, J. L. (2017). NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bone Cancer, Version 2.2017. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.