The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti‐emetic effect of ginger powder versus placebo as an add‐on therapy in children and young adults receiving high emetogenic chemotherapy
Abstract
Purpose: Chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are major adverse effects of chemotherapy. Ginger has been used in postoperative and pregnancy‐induced nausea and vomiting. Data on its utility in reducing CINV in children and young adults are lacking. Patients and Methods: Sixty chemotherapy cycles of cisplatin/doxorubicin in bone sarcoma patients were randomized to ginger root powder capsules or placebo capsules as an additional antiemetic to ondensetron and dexamethasone in a double‐blind design. Acute CINV was defined as nausea and vomiting occurring within 24 hr of start of chemotherapy (days 1–4) and delayed CINV as that occurring after 24 hr of completion of chemotherapy (days 5–10). CINV was evaluated as per Edmonton's Symptom Assessment Scale and National Cancer Institute criteria respectively. Results: Acute moderate to severe nausea was observed in 28/30 (93.3%) cycles in control group as compared to 15/27 (55.6%) cycles in experimental group ( P = 0.003). Acute moderate to severe vomiting was significantly more in the control group compared to the experimental group [23/30 (76.7%) vs. 9/27 (33.33%) respectively ( P = 0.002)]. Delayed moderate to severe nausea was observed in 22/30 (73.3%) cycles in the control group as compared to 7/27 (25.9%) in the experimental group ( P < 0.001). Delayed moderate to severe vomiting was significantly more in the control group compared to the experimental group [14/30 (46.67%) vs. 4/27 (14.81%) ( P = 0.022)]. Conclusion: Ginger root powder was effective in reducing severity of acute and delayed CINV as additional therapy to ondensetron and dexamethasone in patients receiving high emetogenic chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00940368). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;56:234–238. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zingiberis rhizoma: A comprehensive review on the ginger effect and efficacy profiles
Chrubasik, S., Pittler, M. H., & Roufogalis, B. D. (2005) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2004.07.009 · Cited by 623
Cited by
Zhang, M., Zhao, R., Wang, D., Wang, L., Zhang, Q., Wei, S., Lu, F., Peng, W., & Wu, C. (2021) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.6858 · Cited by 258
A review of the gastroprotective effects of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe)
Haniadka, R., Saldanha, E., Sunita, V., Palatty, P. L., Fayad, R., & Baliga, M. S. (2013) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c3fo30337c · Cited by 249
Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
Anh, N. H., Kim, S. J., Long, N. P., Min, J. E., Yoon, Y. C., Lee, E. G., Kim, M., Kim, T. J., Yang, Y. Y., Son, E. Y., et al. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12010157 · Cited by 227
Ginger in gastrointestinal disorders: A systematic review of clinical trials
Nikkhah Bodagh, M., Maleki, I., & Hekmatdoost, A. (2019) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.807 · Cited by 221
Cancer cell signaling pathways targeted by spice-derived nutraceuticals
Sung, B., Prasad, S., Yadav, V. R., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2012) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635581.2012.630551 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Pillai, A. K., Sharma, K. K., Gupta, Y. K., & Bakhshi, S.
- Venue
- Pediatric Blood & Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-14
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 234-238
- ISSN
- 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5017
- OpenAlex
- W2034541620
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.