Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study

Open access
Green, Daniel M., Nolan, Vikki G., Goodman, Pamela J., Whitton, John A., Srivastava, DeoKumar, Leisenring, Wendy M., Neglia, Joseph P., Sklar, Charles A., Kaste, Sue C., Hudson, Melissa M., Diller, Lisa R., Stovall, Marilyn, Donaldson, Sarah S., Robison, Leslie L.·2014·Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract

Background: Estimation of the risk of adverse long‐term outcomes such as second malignant neoplasms and infertility often requires reproducible quantification of exposures. The method for quantification should be easily utilized and valid across different study populations. The widely used Alkylating Agent Dose (AAD) score is derived from the drug dose distribution of the study population and thus cannot be used for comparisons across populations as each will have a unique distribution of drug doses. Methods: We compared the performance of the Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED), a unit for quantifying alkylating agent exposure independent of study population, to the AAD. Comparisons included associations from three Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) outcome analyses, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and goodness of fit based on the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). Results: The CED and AAD performed essentially identically in analyses of risk for pregnancy among the partners of male CCSS participants, risk for adverse dental outcomes among all CCSS participants and risk for premature menopause among female CCSS participants, based on similar associations, lack of statistically significant differences between the areas under the ROC curves and similar model fit values for the AIC between models including the two measures of exposure. Conclusion: The CED is easily calculated, facilitating its use for patient counseling. It is independent of the drug dose distribution of a particular patient population, a characteristic that will allow direct comparisons of outcomes among epidemiological cohorts. We recommend the use of the CED in future research assessing cumulative alkylating agent exposure. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:53–67. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pbc.24679

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Green, D. M., Nolan, V. G., Goodman, P. J., Whitton, J. A., Srivastava, D., Leisenring, W. M., Neglia, J. P., Sklar, C. A., Kaste, S. C., Hudson, M. M., Diller, L. R., Stovall, M., Donaldson, S. S., & Robison, L. L.
Venue
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-12
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
53-67
ISSN
  • 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5017
OpenAlex
W1839076539
Cited by
469
References
29
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pbc.24679
The paper
Green, D. M., Nolan, V. G., Goodman, P. J., Whitton, J. A., Srivastava, D., Leisenring, W. M., Neglia, J. P., Sklar, C. A., Kaste, S. C., Hudson, M. M., Diller, L. R., Stovall, M., Donaldson, S. S., & Robison, L. L. (2014). The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24679

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.