The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validated methods for the quantification of biologically active constituents of poplar‐type propolis
Abstract
The validation of rapid, low‐cost spectrophotometric procedures for the quantification of the three main groups of bioactive substances (flavones and flavonols, flavanones and dihydroflavonols, and total phenolics) in poplar‐type propolis has been performed. A spectrophotometric assay based on the formation of an aluminium chloride complex was applied for the quantification of total flavones and flavonols using galangin as standard. Because of the high amount of flavanones and dihydroflavonols in “poplar type” propolis, the introduction of a distinct procedure for their quantification was considered of special significance and the DAB9 colorimetric method was applied for the purpose. Total phenolic content was measured by the Folin–Ciocalteu procedure using a mixture of pinocembrin and galangin as a reference. The procedures were validated using a model mixture of compounds representing the poplar‐type propolis composition as found in previous studies. The accuracy (recovery) varied in the range 84–109%, and the relative standard deviation was 0.5–6.2%. The developed spectrophotometric procedures were applied to six poplar type propolis samples. The results were verified independently by a HPLC procedure. The two sets of results agreed satisfactory, as proven by Student's t‐test. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees
Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Gómez-Romero, M., Arráez-Román, D., Segura-Carretero, A., & Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. (2006) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.03.002 · Cited by 441
Historical Aspects of Propolis Research in Modern Times
Kuropatnicki, A. K., Szliszka, E., & Krol, W. (2013) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2013/964149 · Cited by 346
Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study
Trusheva, B., Trunkova, D., & Bankova, V. (2007) · Chemistry Central Journal · doi:10.1186/1752-153x-1-13 · Cited by 304
Self-citationIloki-Assanga, S. B., Lewis-Luján, L. M., Lara-Espinoza, C. L., Gil-Salido, A. A., Fernandez-Angulo, D., Rubio-Pino, J. L., & Haines, D. D. (2015) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1388-1 · Cited by 289
Roman, I., Stănilă, A., & Stănilă, S. (2013) · Chemistry Central Journal · doi:10.1186/1752-153x-7-73 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Popova, M., Bankova, V., Butovska, D., Petkov, V., Nikolova‐Damyanova, B., Sabatini, A. G., Marcazzan, G. L., & Bogdanov, S.
- Venue
- Phytochemical Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-240
- ISSN
- 0958-0344 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1565
- OpenAlex
- W1997051735
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validated methods for the quantification of biologically active constituents of poplar‐type propolis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pca.777
- The paper
- Popova, M., Bankova, V., Butovska, D., Petkov, V., Nikolova‐Damyanova, B., Sabatini, A. G., Marcazzan, G. L., & Bogdanov, S. (2004). Validated methods for the quantification of biologically active constituents of poplar‐type propolis. Phytochemical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.