The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Propolis is widely used in apitherapy, preparations, and food and beverage additives. Various extraction techniques were applied in the extraction of the biologically active constituents of poplar type propolis in order to compare their efficiency. The methods employed were: traditional maceration extraction, ultrasound extraction (UE), and microwave assisted extraction (MAE). RESULTS: The total amounts of extracted phenolics and flavonoids were determined, and the effectiveness of the methods compared. MAE was very rapid but led to the extraction of a large amount of non-phenolic and non-flavonoid material. UE gave the highest percentage of extracted phenolics. CONCLUSION: Compared to the maceration extraction, MAE and UE methods provided high extraction yield, requiring short timeframes and less labour. UE was shown to be the most efficient method based on yield, extraction time and selectivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of propolis: some parameters and procedures for chemical quality control
Woisky, R. G., & Salatino, A. (1998) · Journal of Apicultural Research · doi:10.1080/00218839.1998.11100961 · Cited by 1,362
Kaufmann, B., & Christen, P. (2002) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.631 · Cited by 831
Ghisalberti, E. L. (1979) · Bee World · doi:10.1080/0005772x.1979.11097738 · Cited by 729
A review of modern sample-preparation techniques for the extraction and analysis of medicinal plants
Huie, C. W. (2002) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-002-1265-3 · Cited by 584
Ghisalberti, E. L. (1976) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 580
Validated methods for the quantification of biologically active constituents of poplar‐type propolis
Popova, M., Bankova, V., Butovska, D., Petkov, V., Nikolova‐Damyanova, B., Sabatini, A. G., Marcazzan, G. L., & Bogdanov, S. (2004) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.777 · Cited by 370
Self-citationAntibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition
Popova, M., Silici, S., Kaftanoglu, O., & Bankova, V. (2005) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007 · Cited by 308
Self-citationFactors that influence the yield and composition of Brazilian propolis extracts
Cunha, I. B. D. S., Sawaya, A. C. H. F., Caetano, F. M., Shimizu, M. T., Marcucci, M. C., Drezza, F. T., Povia, G. S., & Carvalho, P. D. O. (2004) · Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society · doi:10.1590/s0103-50532004000600026 · Cited by 222
The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetics
Bonvehí, J. S., Coll, F. V., & Jordà, R. E. (1994) · Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society · doi:10.1007/bf02540666 · Cited by 202
Preparation of Water and Ethanolic Extracts of Propolis and Evaluation of the Preparations
Park, Y. K., & Ikegaki, M. (1998) · Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.62.2230 · Cited by 127
Cited by
A review on the extraction methods use in medicinal plants, principle, strength and limitation
(2015) · Medicinal & Aromatic Plants · doi:10.4172/2167-0412.1000196 · Cited by 1,325
Bitwell, C., Indra, S. S., Luke, C., & Kakoma, M. K. (2023) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01585 · Cited by 648
Contieri, L. S., de Souza Mesquita, L. M., Sanches, V. L., Chaves, J., Pizani, R. S., da Silva, L. C., Viganó, J., Ventura, S. P. M., & Rostagno, M. A. (2022) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121640 · Cited by 50
Comparison of the Biological Potential and Chemical Composition of Brazilian and Mexican Propolis
Silva-Beltrán, N. P., Umsza-Guez, M. A., Ramos Rodrigues, D. M., Gálvez-Ruiz, J. C., de Paula Castro, T. L., & Balderrama-Carmona, A. P. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112311417 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Trusheva, B., Trunkova, D., & Bankova, V.
- Venue
- Chemistry Central Journal
- Published
- 2007-06-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-13
- ISSN
- 1752-153X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146992149
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1752-153x-1-13
- The paper
- Trusheva, B., Trunkova, D., & Bankova, V. (2007). Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study. Chemistry Central Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153x-1-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
