The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Historical Aspects of Propolis Research in Modern Times
Open accessAbstract
Propolis (bee glue) has been known for centuries. The ancient Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians were aware of the healing properties of propolis and made extensive use of it as a medicine. In the middle ages propolis was not a very popular topic and its use in mainstream medicine disappeared. However, the knowledge of medicinal properties of propolis survived in traditional folk medicine. The interest in propolis returned in Europe together with the renaissance theory of ad fontes. It has only been in the last century that scientists have been able to prove that propolis is as active and important as our forefathers thought. Research on chemical composition of propolis started at the beginning of the twentieth century and was continued after WW II. Advances in chromatographic analytical methods enabled separation and extraction of several components from propolis. At least 180 different compounds have been identified so far. Its antibacterial, antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, anesthetic, and healing properties have been confirmed. Propolis has been effectively used in treatment of dermatological, laryngological, and gynecological problems, neurodegenerative diseases, in wound healing, and in treatment of burns and ulcers. However, it requires further research that may lead to new discoveries of its composition and possible applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids
Cushnie, T. P. T., & Lamb, A. J. (2005) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.002 · Cited by 3,195
Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis)
Burdock, G. A. (1998) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00145-2 · Cited by 1,603
Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. 1.-1. (1968) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 1,455
Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin
Bankova, V. S., de Castro, S. L., & Marcucci, M. C. (2000) · Apidologie · doi:10.1051/apido:2000102 · Cited by 1,327
Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity
Marcucci, M. C. (1995) · Apidologie · doi:10.1051/apido:19950202 · Cited by 1,323
(1938) · Tubercle · doi:10.1016/s0041-3879(38)80086-6 · Cited by 906
Propolis: Is there a potential for the development of new drugs?
Sforcin, J. M., & Bankova, V. (2011) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.032 · Cited by 872
Functional Properties of Honey, Propolis, and Royal Jelly
Viuda‐Martos, M., Ruiz‐Navajas, Y., Fernández‐López, J., & Pérez‐Álvarez, J. A. (2008) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00966.x · Cited by 864
Chemical diversity of propolis and the problem of standardization
Bankova, V. S. (2005) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2005.05.004 · Cited by 770
Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine
Castaldo, S., & Capasso, F. (2002) · Fitoterapia · doi:10.1016/s0367-326x(02)00185-5 · Cited by 744
Cited by
Propolis and its potential against SARS-CoV-2 infection mechanisms and COVID-19 disease
Berretta, A. A., Silveira, M. A. D., Cóndor Capcha, J. M., & De Jong, D. (2020) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110622 · Cited by 269
Potential role of propolis in wound healing: Biological properties and therapeutic activities
Oryan, A., Alemzadeh, E., & Moshiri, A. (2018) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.069 · Cited by 238
Propolis: a new frontier for wound healing?
Martinotti, S., & Ranzato, E. (2015) · Burns & Trauma · doi:10.1186/s41038-015-0010-z · Cited by 213
Rizvi, S. A. A., Einstein, G. P., Tulp, O. L., Sainvil, F., & Branly, R. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12101442 · Cited by 181
Wieczorek, P. P., Hudz, N., Yezerska, O., Horčinová-Sedláčková, V., Shanaida, M., Korytniuk, O., & Jasicka-Misiak, I. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27051600 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuropatnicki, A. K., Szliszka, E., & Krol, W.
- Venue
- Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1741-427X (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4288
- OpenAlex
- W2136848635
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical Aspects of Propolis Research in Modern Times. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2013/964149
- The paper
- Kuropatnicki, A. K., Szliszka, E., & Krol, W. (2013). Historical Aspects of Propolis Research in Modern Times. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/964149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.