The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterizing phenotypes and outcomes of drug‐associated liver injury using electronic medical record data
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the incidence, phenotypes, and outcomes of drug‐associated liver injury identified in electronic medical record (EMR) data using standardized criteria for drug‐induced liver injury (DILI). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used EMR data from a large integrated healthcare system. Study inclusion required 18 years of age or older, ≥1 prescription fill for any of 14 medications associated with hepatotoxicity between 1 January 2003 and 30 June 2009, and ≥12 months of membership prior to the drug exposure. Patients with underlying non‐drug causes of liver injury were excluded to minimize capture of liver injury events unrelated to drugs. Drug‐associated liver injuries were identified by liver chemistry elevations temporally associated with drug use based on standardized criteria for DILI. Cases were classified by clinical pattern and severity. Outcomes of liver transplant and all‐cause and liver‐related death were examined. Results: A total of 1 053 979 drug exposures were identified in 601 125 patients. We identified 265 drug‐associated liver injuries (32.8 per 100 000 persons) occurring in 250 patients. Isoniazid exhibited the highest incidence rate of 606 per 100 000 persons. Of the 265 cases, 41% were mild; 12% exhibited moderate drug‐associated liver injury (with concomitant ALT ≥ 5× ULN and bilirubin ≥2× ULN); and 17% exhibited coagulopathy, ascites, encephalopathy, or other organ failure. Last, seven cases (3%) were associated with death, and there were no liver transplants. Conclusions: Study results align with earlier prospective studies, supporting the value of standardized methodology to identify drug‐associated liver injury in the EMR. These methods can potentially enhance safety and clinical outcomes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the incidence appears to be higher in exposure‐based studies using electronic medical records (32.8 per 100,000 adult patients who received one of the top implicated drugs in the United States and 40 per 100,000 patients at a pediatric hospital).11,12”
From AASLD practice guidance on drug, herbal, and dietary supplement–induced liver injury (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statin safety: an assessment using an administrative claims database
Cziraky, M. J., Willey, V. J., McKenney, J. M., Kamat, S. A., Fisher, M. D., Guyton, J. R., Jacobson, T. A., & Davidson, M. H. (2006) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.011 · Cited by 130
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01926230590522356 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02133.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1053/jhep.2002.34857 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1164/rccm.200510-1666ST · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00231-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/pds.856 · DOI
- 10.1053/jhep.2003.50193 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00602-1 · DOI
- 10.2165/11535340-000000000-00000 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.22272 · DOI
- 10.1038/clpt.2011.58 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90101-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1053/gast.2002.36061 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.20548 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01456.x · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6963-7-159 · DOI
- Carson JL, 1993, Safety of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs with respect to acute liver disease, Arch Intern Med, 153, 1331, 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410110039007 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-119-7_Part_1-199310010-00005 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.163.6.728 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00979.x · DOI
- 10.1053/gast.2002.33650 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2007.00853.x · DOI
- 10.1002/pds.1966 · DOI
- 10.1002/pds.1281 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.032 · DOI
- 10.1097/00042737-200409000-00010 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.865 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001648-199311000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hep.21424 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hep.20800 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/00365528209182041 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkr159 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.281.11.1014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1517/14740330903397378 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMp1014427 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
AASLD practice guidance on drug, herbal, and dietary supplement–induced liver injury
Fontana, R. J., Liou, I., Reuben, A., Suzuki, A., Fiel, M. I., Lee, W., & Navarro, V. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.32689 · Cited by 340
Self-citationThe Frequency of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Due to Antibiotics Among Hospitalised Patients
Björnsson, R. A., Sigurdsson, S. S., Arnarson, D. T., Logason, E., & Björnsson, E. S. (2025) · Drug Safety · doi:10.1007/s40264-025-01541-w · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, J., Hunt, C. M., Suzuki, A., Papay, J. I., Beach, K. J., & Cheetham, T. C.
- Affiliations
- Pharmacy Analytical Services Kaiser Permanente Southern California Downey California USA
- GlaxoSmithKline Research Triangle Park North Carolina USA
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-19
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-198
- ISSN
- 1053-8569
- 1099-1557
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.