Using machine learning to identify diabetes patients with canagliflozin prescriptions at high‐risk of lower extremity amputation using real‐world data
Abstract
Aims Canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor indicated for lowering glucose, has been increasingly used in diabetes patients because of its beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. However, clinical trials have documented an increased risk of lower extremity amputations (LEA) associated with canagliflozin. We applied machine learning methods to predict LEA among diabetes patients treated with canagliflozin. Methods Using claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified 13 904 diabetes individuals initiating canagliflozin between April 2013 and December 2016. The samples were randomly and equally split into training and testing sets. We identified 41 predictor candidates using information from the year prior to canagliflozin initiation, and applied four machine learning approaches (elastic net, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO], gradient boosting machine and random forests) to predict LEA risk after canagliflozin initiation. Results The incidence rate of LEA was 0.57% over a median 1.5 years follow-up. LASSO produced the best prediction, yielding a C-statistic of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.86). Among individuals categorized in the top 5% of the risk score, the actual incidence rate of LEA was 3.74%. Among the 16 factors selected by LASSO, history of LEA [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 33.6 (13.8, 81.9)] and loop diuretic use [aOR: 3.6 (1.8,7.3)] had the strongest associations with LEA incidence. Conclus…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yang et al. reported that LASSO regression using risk factors to estimate the risk of amputation in patients treated with canagliflozin produced the best prediction, yielding a C index of 0.81.
“LASSO produced the best prediction, yielding a C index of 0.81”
From Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al.100
Cites
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes
Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., Bluhmki, E., Hantel, S., Mattheus, M., Devins, T., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504720 · Cited by 12,315 · see citing works
Perkovic, V., de Zeeuw, D., Mahaffey, K. W., Fulcher, G., Erondu, N., Shaw, W., Barrett, T. D., Weidner-Wells, M., Deng, H., Matthews, D. R., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30141-4 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Chang, H.-Y., Singh, S., Mansour, O., Baksh, S., & Alexander, G. C. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3034 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges
Guan, Z., Li, H., Liu, R., Cai, C., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., Huang, S., Wu, L., Liu, D., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101213 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, L., Gabriel, N., Hernandez, I., Winterstein, A. G., & Guo, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Lanting
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 644-651
- ISSN
- 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1557
- OpenAlex
- W3129698616
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- canagliflozin, lower limb amputation, SGLT2 inhibitors, diabetes mellitus, risk prediction, loop diuretics, adverse drug reactions, Medicare beneficiaries, real-world data
- MeSH terms
- Canagliflozin, Machine Learning, Aged, Amputation, Surgical, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Medicare, Humans, Risk Factors, United States, Lower Extremity, Prescriptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review