Cited by 7Advanced Cellulose Research StudiesNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Fabrication of polycaprolactone/polyvinyl alcohol green composite film by reinforcing extracted micro cellulose fibers for food packaging applications

Chanthavong, Vinitsa, Cabo, Maurelio, Prabhakar, M. N., Woo, Lee Dong, Song, Jung‐il·2025·Polymer Engineering & Science

Abstract

Abstract This study presents an innovative strategy for sustainable food packaging by fabricating green composites composed of a polycaprolactone (PCL) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) blend reinforced with polyethylene oxide (PEO)‐modified cellulose microfibers (mCMFs) extracted from biowaste. A series of composites containing varying concentrations of mCMFs (1–3 wt%) were prepared using extrusion and injection molding. Remarkably, the incorporation of just 1 wt% mCMFs enhanced the mechanical properties by 49.15% compared to the PCL–PVA blend. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed improved thermal stability, with the initial degradation temperature increasing from 343°C (PCL) and 209°C (PVA) to 384°C for the 1%mCMFs/PCL–PVA composite. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) also indicated enhanced thermal behavior, with the melting temperature rising from 68°C (PCL–PVA) to 72°C (1%mCMFs/PCL–PVA). SEM and FTIR analyses confirmed improved fiber–matrix adhesion and stronger hydrogen bonding interactions. Furthermore, density functional theory (DFT) calculations using Gaussian software theoretically validated these interactions by comparing hydrogen bond energies: 1504.53 kcal/mol for PEO‐modified cellulose, 763.35 kcal/mol for PCL–PVA, and a significantly higher value of 2201.23 kcal/mol for the 1%mCMFs/PCL–PVA composite. These results underscore the synergistic effect of PEO and cellulose in enhancing the performance of the PCL–PVA composite, offering a biodegradable, thermally stable, and mechanically robust material suitable for food packaging applications. Highlights PVA film improved thermal traits of PCL–PVA polymer blend. PEO‐modified CMFs enhanced matrix–filler compatibility. mCMFs reinforced PCL–PVA via extrusion/injection molding. mCMFs raised PCL–PVA composite strength by 49%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pen.27241

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chanthavong, V., Cabo, M., Prabhakar, M. N., Woo, L. D., & Song, J.
Affiliations
  • Changwon National University (KR)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Research Institute of Mechatronics, Department of Mechanical Engineering Changwon National University Changwon South Korea
Corresponding author
Song, Jung‐il
Venue
Polymer Engineering & Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-04-25
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
3673-3686
ISSN
  • 0032-3888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-2634
OpenAlex
W4409808241
Cited by
7
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer Engineering and Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2018R1A6A1A03024509, 2023R1A2C1006234)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Keywords
polycaprolactone, polyvinyl alcohol, polymer blend composites, cellulose microfibers, food packaging, biodegradable films, mechanical reinforcement, thermal stability, hydrogen bonding, fiber-matrix adhesion, extrusion-injection molding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review