The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine correlates of ‘workaholism’ components (Work Involvement, Drive, Enjoyment of Work). A cross‐occupational sample of 661 Norwegian employees in six different organizations completed a web‐based survey measuring ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. Needs satisfaction at work was positively related to Enjoyment of Work, and negatively to Drive. Conscientiousness was positively related to all ‘workaholism’ components; Extraversion and Openness to Work Involvement and Enjoyment of Work; and Neuroticism to Drive. Negative relations were found between Neuroticism and Enjoyment of Work, and Agreeableness and Drive. Although the associations were rather weak, the findings give reason to differentiate between enthusiastic and non‐enthusiastic ‘workaholic’ characteristics, which were consistent with predictions taken from central theories on ‘workaholism’. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.
Siegrist, J. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 · Cited by 5,713
The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life.
Bonebright, C. A., Clay, D. L., & Ankenmann, R. D. (2000) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.469 · Cited by 475
Cited by
Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 · Cited by 3,199
Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale
Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/02.09.18.pr0.110.2.501-517 · Cited by 1,884
Self-citationThe Psychology of Working Theory.
Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000140 · Cited by 1,020
Cell-phone addiction: a review
De-Sola Gutiérrez, J., Rodríguez de Fonseca, F., & Rubio, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00175 · Cited by 722
The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.2.2013.003 · Cited by 589
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreassen, C. S., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-17
- ISSN
- 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0984
- OpenAlex
- W2031549323
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/per.737
- The paper
- Andreassen, C. S., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2010). The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
