Cited by 26Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchSchool Health and Nursing Education

The educational implications of type i diabetes mellitus: A review of research and recommendations for school psychological practice

Kucera, Miranda, Sullivan, Amanda L.·2011·Psychology in the Schools

Abstract

Type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic illnesses in children and youth, with many affected students requiring individualized services and supports within educational settings. This article systematically reviews the research regarding the implications of this illness for students' cognitive and academic functioning to clarify the ways in which this disease may limit children's learning and school performance. The authors synthesize the findings, summarize the related literature regarding school‐based supports, and provide recommendations for school psychologists to support the unique psychoeducational needs of this population. Results highlight the need for more research on effective school‐based interventions to ensure academic success for children with T1DM. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pits.20573

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type I diabetes is associated with lower full-scale IQ, lower abstract reasoning, reduced processing speed and motor responding, poorer focused and selective attention and behavioral inhibition, and lower reading and math scores.

    “Association between type I diabetes and lower on full-scale IQ measures, lower scores on measures of abstract reasoning, reduced processing speed and motor responding, poorer performance on tasks requiring focused, selective attention, and behavioral inhibition, and lower scores in reading and math.”

    From Critical connections: health and academics (2015) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Diabetes is linked to decreased attention and lower test scores.

    “diabetes is linked to decreased attention and lower test scores,61,62”

    From Critical connections: health and academics (2015) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kucera, M., & Sullivan, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Amanda L.
Venue
Psychology in the Schools
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-16
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
587-603
ISSN
  • 0033-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6807
OpenAlex
W2087501574
Cited by
26
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology in the Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, school psychology, children with chronic illness, academic performance, cognitive function, school-based support, school-based intervention, children and young people

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review