The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peptidomic analysis of human blood specimens: Comparison between plasma specimens and serum by differential peptide display
Abstract
The human Plasma Proteome Project pilot phase aims to analyze serum and plasma specimens to elucidate specimen characteristics by various proteomic techniques to ensure sufficient sample quality for the HUPO main phase. We used our proprietary peptidomics technologies to analyze the samples distributed by HUPO. Peptidomics summarizes technologies for visualization, quantitation, and identification of the low‐molecular‐weight proteome (<15 kDa), the “peptidome.” We analyzed all four HUPO specimens (EDTA plasma, citrate plasma, heparin plasma, and serum) from African‐ and Asian‐American donors and compared them to in‐house collected Caucasian specimens. One main finding focuses on the most suitable method of plasma specimen collection. Gentle platelet removal from plasma samples is beneficial for improved specificity. Platelet contamination or activation of platelets by low temperature prior to their removal leads to distinct and multiple peptide signals in plasma samples. Two different specimen collection protocols for platelet‐poor plasma are recommended. Further emphasis is placed on the differences between plasma and serum on a peptidomic level. A large number of peptides, many of them in rather high abundance, are only present in serum and not detectable in plasma. This ex vivo generation of multiple peptides hampers discovery efforts and is caused by a variety of factors: the release of platelet‐derived peptides, other peptides derived from cellular components or the clot, enzymatic activities of coagulation cascades, and other proteases. We conclude that specimen collection is a crucial step for successful peptide biomarker discovery in human blood samples. For analysis of the low‐molecular‐weight proteome, we recommend the use of platelet‐depleted EDTA or citrate plasma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Mass Spectrometry as a Diagnostic and a Cancer Biomarker Discovery Tool
Diamandis, E. P. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r400007-mcp200 · Cited by 631
Villanueva, J., Philip, J., Entenberg, D., Chaparro, C. A., Tanwar, M. K., Holland, E. C., & Tempst, P. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0352171 · Cited by 449
A data review and re-assessment of ovarian cancer serum proteomic profiling
Sorace, J. M., & Zhan, M. (2003) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-24 · Cited by 336
Peptidomics The Comprehensive Analysis of Peptides in Complex Biological Mixtures
Schulz-Knappe, P., Hans-Dieter, Z., Heine, G., Jurgens, M., & Schrader, M. (2012) · Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening · doi:10.2174/1386207013331246 · Cited by 195
Self-citationComposition of the peptide fraction in human blood plasma: database of circulating human peptides
Richter, R., Schulz-Knappe, P., Schrader, M., Ständker, L., Jürgens, M., Tammen, H., & Forssmann, W.-G. (1999) · Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4347(99)00012-2 · Cited by 193
Self-citationPeptidomics technologies for human body fluids
Schrader, M., & Schulz-Knappe, P. (2001) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(01)00010-5 · Cited by 179
Self-citationHow Industry Is Approaching the Search for New Diagnostic Markers and Biomarkers
Zolg, J. W., & Langen, H. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400007-mcp200 · Cited by 170
Check, E. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/429496a · Cited by 168
Cited by
Omenn, G. S., States, D. J., Adamski, M., Blackwell, T. W., Menon, R., Hermjakob, H., Apweiler, R., Haab, B. B., Simpson, R. J., Eddes, J. S., et al. (2005) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200500358 · Cited by 787
Self-citationInterferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays
Bowen, R. A. R., & Remaley, A. T. (2014) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2014.006 · Cited by 316
Weber, D., Davies, M. J., & Grune, T. (2015) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.005 · Cited by 295
Rahmioglu, N., Fassbender, A., Vitonis, A. F., Tworoger, S. S., Hummelshoj, L., D'Hooghe, T. M., Adamson, G. D., Giudice, L. C., Becker, C. M., Zondervan, K. T., et al. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1208 · Cited by 227
Hu, L., Boos, K.-S., Ye, M., Wu, R., & Zou, H. (2009) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.030 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Tammen, H., Schulte, I., Hess, R., Menzel, C., Kellmann, M., Mohring, T., & Schulz‐Knappe, P.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3414-3422
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2004473457
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptidomic analysis of human blood specimens: Comparison between plasma specimens and serum by differential peptide display. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200401219
- The paper
- Tammen, H., Schulte, I., Hess, R., Menzel, C., Kellmann, M., Mohring, T., & Schulz‐Knappe, P. (2005). Peptidomic analysis of human blood specimens: Comparison between plasma specimens and serum by differential peptide display. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.