Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peptidomic analysis of human blood specimens: Comparison between plasma specimens and serum by differential peptide display

Tammen, Harald, Schulte, Imke, Hess, Rudiger, Menzel, Christoph, Kellmann, Markus, Mohring, Thomas, Schulz‐Knappe, Peter·2005·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

The human Plasma Proteome Project pilot phase aims to analyze serum and plasma specimens to elucidate specimen characteristics by various proteomic techniques to ensure sufficient sample quality for the HUPO main phase. We used our proprietary peptidomics technologies to analyze the samples distributed by HUPO. Peptidomics summarizes technologies for visualization, quantitation, and identification of the low‐molecular‐weight proteome (<15 kDa), the “peptidome.” We analyzed all four HUPO specimens (EDTA plasma, citrate plasma, heparin plasma, and serum) from African‐ and Asian‐American donors and compared them to in‐house collected Caucasian specimens. One main finding focuses on the most suitable method of plasma specimen collection. Gentle platelet removal from plasma samples is beneficial for improved specificity. Platelet contamination or activation of platelets by low temperature prior to their removal leads to distinct and multiple peptide signals in plasma samples. Two different specimen collection protocols for platelet‐poor plasma are recommended. Further emphasis is placed on the differences between plasma and serum on a peptidomic level. A large number of peptides, many of them in rather high abundance, are only present in serum and not detectable in plasma. This ex vivo generation of multiple peptides hampers discovery efforts and is caused by a variety of factors: the release of platelet‐derived peptides, other peptides derived from cellular components or the clot, enzymatic activities of coagulation cascades, and other proteases. We conclude that specimen collection is a crucial step for successful peptide biomarker discovery in human blood samples. For analysis of the low‐molecular‐weight proteome, we recommend the use of platelet‐depleted EDTA or citrate plasma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200401219

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Tammen, H., Schulte, I., Hess, R., Menzel, C., Kellmann, M., Mohring, T., & Schulz‐Knappe, P.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08
Volume
5
Issue
13
Pages
3414-3422
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2004473457
Cited by
260
References
13
FWCI
10.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptidomic analysis of human blood specimens: Comparison between plasma specimens and serum by differential peptide display. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200401219
The paper
Tammen, H., Schulte, I., Hess, R., Menzel, C., Kellmann, M., Mohring, T., & Schulz‐Knappe, P. (2005). Peptidomic analysis of human blood specimens: Comparison between plasma specimens and serum by differential peptide display. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401219

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.