Cited by 31Advanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Antiviral antibody profiling by high‐density protein arrays

Open access
Bian, Xiaofang, Wiktor, Peter, Kahn, Peter, Brunner, Al, Khela, Amritpal, Karthikeyan, Kailash, Barker, Kristi, Yu, Xiaobo +6 more·2015·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Viral infections elicit antiviral antibodies and have been associated with various chronic diseases. Detection of these antibodies can facilitate diagnosis, treatment of infection, and understanding of the mechanisms of virus‐associated diseases. In this work, we assayed antiviral antibodies using a novel high‐density nucleic acid programmable protein array (HD‐NAPPA) platform. Individual viral proteins were expressed in situ directly from plasmids encoding proteins in an array of microscopic reaction chambers. Quality of protein display and serum response was assured by comparing intra‐ and inter‐array correlation within or between printing batches with average correlation coefficients of 0.91 and 0.96, respectively. HD‐NAPPA showed higher signal‐to‐background ratio compared with standard NAPPA on planar glass slides and ELISA. Antibody responses to 761 antigens from 25 different viruses were profiled among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and type 1 diabetes. Common and unique antibody reactivity patterns were detected between patients and healthy controls. We believe HD‐viral‐NAPPA will enable the study of host–pathogen interactions at unprecedented dimensions and elucidate the role of pathogen infections in disease development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201400612

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LaBaer lab has since released a panviral proteome set of 2035 open reading frame clones generated from 830 viral genes from both DNA and RNA viruses.

    “Available as a cloning resource, the LaBaer lab has since released a panviral proteome set of 2035 open reading frame clones generated from 830 viral genes from both DNA and RNA viruses, including HCMV, HSV-1, KSHV, vaccinia virus, SINV, chikungunya virus, and yellow fever virus [104,111].”
  • The technology has been advantageously employed to profile antiviral antibodies produced by infected cells on a high-density NAPPA array of viral antigens.

    “Additionally, the technology has been advantageously employed to profile antiviral antibodies produced by infected cells on a high-density NAPPA array of viral antigens [111].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Yoon JW Austin M Onodera T Notkins AL Isolation of a virus from the pancreas of a child with diabetic ketoacidosis N Engl J Med 1979 300 1173 1179 219345

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bian, X., Wiktor, P., Kahn, P., Brunner, A., Khela, A., Karthikeyan, K., Barker, K., Yu, X., Magee, M., Wasserfall, C. H., Gibson, D., Rooney, M. E., Qiu, J., & LaBaer, J.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Engineering Arts (United States) (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Qiu, Ji
  • LaBaer, Joshua
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-15
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
2136-2145
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2105857986
Cited by
31
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (5-2012-537)
  • National Institute of Health (R42GM106704)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
antiviral antibodies, antibody profiling, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, type 1 diabetes, host-pathogen interaction, viral infection, autoimmunity
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Viral, Arthritis, Juvenile, Autoantibodies, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Nucleic Acids, Viral Proteins, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Protein Array Analysis, Proteomics, Immunoprecipitation, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review