The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vinyl esters: Low cytotoxicity monomers for the fabrication of biocompatible 3D scaffolds by lithography based additive manufacturing
Abstract
Lithography based additive manufacturing technologies (AMT) like stereolithography or digital light processing have become appealing methods for the fabrication of 3D cellular scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. To circumvent the use of (meth)acrylate‐based photopolymers, that suffer from skin irritation and sometimes cytotoxicity, new monomers based on vinyl esters were prepared. In vitro cytotoxicity studies with osteoblast‐like cells proofed that monomers based on vinyl esters are significantly less cytotoxic than (meth)acrylates. Photoreactivity was followed by photo‐differential scanning calorimetry and the mechanical properties of the photocured materials were screened by nanoindentation. Conversion rates and indentation moduli between those of acrylate and methacrylate references could be observed. Furthermore, osteoblast‐like cells were successfully seeded onto polymer specimens. Finally, we were able to print a 3D test structure out of a vinyl ester‐based formulation by μ‐SLA with a layer thickness of 50 μm. For in vivo testing of vinyl esters these 3D scaffolds were implanted into surgical defects of the distal femoral bone of adult New Zealand white rabbits. The obtained histological results approved the excellent biocompatibility of vinyl esters. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives
Roseti, L., Parisi, V., Petretta, M., Cavallo, C., Desando, G., Bartolotti, I., & Grigolo, B. (2017) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017 · Cited by 1,320
A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies
Vaezi, M., Seitz, H., & Yang, S. (2013) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 · Cited by 1,293
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Heller, C., Schwentenwein, M., Russmueller, G., Varga, F., Stampfl, J., & Liska, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6941-6954
- ISSN
- 0887-624X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0518
- OpenAlex
- W2023369644
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vinyl esters: Low cytotoxicity monomers for the fabrication of biocompatible 3D scaffolds by lithography based additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pola.23734
- The paper
- Heller, C., Schwentenwein, M., Russmueller, G., Varga, F., Stampfl, J., & Liska, R. (2009). Vinyl esters: Low cytotoxicity monomers for the fabrication of biocompatible 3D scaffolds by lithography based additive manufacturing. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.23734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.