Cited by 58Block Copolymer Self-AssemblyPolymer crystallization and propertiesAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

Morphological behavior of model poly(ethylene‐alt‐propylene)‐b‐polylactide diblock copolymers

Schmidt, Scott C., Hillmyer, Marc A.·2002·Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics

Abstract

A set of well‐defined poly(ethylene‐alt‐propylene)‐b‐polylactide (PEP‐PLA) diblock copolymers containing volume fractions of PLA (fPLA) ranging between 0.08 and 0.91 were synthesized by a combination of living anionic polymerization, catalytic hydrogenation, and controlled coordination‐insertion ring‐opening polymerization. The morphological behavior of these relatively low‐molecular‐weight PEP‐PLA diblock copolymers was investigated with a combination of rheology, small‐angle X‐ray scattering, and differential scanning calorimetry. The ordered microstructures observed were lamellae (L), hexagonally packed cylinders (C), spheres (S), and gyroid (G), a bicontinous cubic morphology having Ia3d space group symmetry. The G morphology existed in only a small region between the L‐C morphologies in close proximity to the order–disorder transition (ODT). Transformations from L to G were observed upon heating in several samples. The efficacy of the reverse G to L transition in one sample was cooling rate dependent. The PEP‐PLA Flory–Huggins interaction parameter as a function of temperature χPEP‐PLA(T) was estimated fromTODT's by mean‐field theory and subsequently used in the construction of the experimental PEP‐PLA morphology diagram (χNversusfPLA). The resultant morphology diagram was symmetric there were the well‐defined L‐C morphology boundaries. The low molecular weight of the materials imparted no significant deviation from previously documented diblock systems. © 2002 Wiley Per…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/polb.10291

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the hard block is poly(lactide), at a fixed molar mass, decreasing the polarity of the midblock segment effectively increases the segregation strength of the two blocks.

    “Since in this work the hard block is poly(lactide), at a fi xed molar mass, decreasing the polarity of the midblock segment e ff ectively increases the segregation strength of the two blocks. 11,13,64,85 -89”

    From Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymer Design (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, S. C., & Hillmyer, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Hillmyer, Marc A.
Venue
Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-26
Volume
40
Issue
20
Pages
2364-2376
ISSN
  • 0887-6266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0488
OpenAlex
W2057763799
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
diblock copolymers, block copolymer morphology, order-disorder transition, gyroid morphology, lamellar morphology, hexagonal cylinders, sphere, morphology diagram, Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, living anionic polymerization, ring-opening polymerization, catalytic hydrogenation, low molecular weight polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review