Cited by 51Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

An exploration of anticipatory grief in advanced cancer patients

Cheng, Joanna O. Y., Lo, Raymond S. K., Chan, Faye M. Y., Kwan, Bonnie H. F., Woo, Jean·2010·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research on anticipatory grief (AG) has been more focused on the experience of relatives than the terminally ill patients. This study will present qualitative 'thick descriptions' of advanced cancer patient's experience of AG and explore how it is experienced in the family context. METHOD: Seven advanced incurable cancer patients (median 58 years) were recruited from the day hospice and five patients comprised the final sample. Participants were invited to attend focus groups and individual interviews to discuss their experience of terminal illness, thoughts and feelings related to AG and how they cope with losses and grief in the family. Qualitative transcripts were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULT: Two inter-related themes of AG were identified. The first main theme 'subjective experience of AG' comprises confrontations with death and multiple losses; and resistance against death and loss. The second main theme 'experience of AG in the family' explored the patient's role in the family interaction patterns and interpersonal processes. CONCLUSION: An understanding in the subjective experience of AG in terminally ill patients and their experience of AG in the family may contribute to the development of psychotherapeutic interventions. The generative role of the patient in the family grief process is also highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1613

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, J. O. Y., Lo, R. S. K., Chan, F. M. Y., Kwan, B. H. F., & Woo, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Shatin Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Joanna O. Y.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-27
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
693-700
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2023905371
Cited by
51
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
anticipatory grief, advanced cancer, terminal illness, family grief, coping with loss, death and dying, family interaction, hospice care, psychotherapeutic interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Death, Communication, Defense Mechanisms, Family, Female, Grief, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Object Attachment, Intractable Pain, Quality of Life, Set, Psychology, Sick Role, Terminal Care, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review