Cited by 144Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careSexual function and dysfunction studies

Sexual functioning in young adult survivors of childhood cancer

Open access
Zebrack, Brad J., Foley, Sallie, Wittmann, Daniela, Leonard, Marcia·2010·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of sexuality or sexual behavior in childhood cancer survivors tend to examine relationships or achievement of developmental milestones but not physiological response to cancer or treatment. The purpose of this study is to (1) identify prevalence and risk factors for sexual dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors, and (2) examine the extent to which sexual dysfunction may be associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and psychosocial outcomes. METHODS: Five hundred ninety-nine survivors age 18-39 years completed standardized measures of sexual functioning, HRQOL, psychological distress and life satisfaction. Descriptive statistics assessed prevalence of sexual symptoms. Bivariate analyses identified correlates of sexual symptoms and examined associations between symptoms and HRQOL/psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: Most survivors appear to be doing well, although 52% of female survivors and 32% of male survivors reported at least 'a little of a problem' in one or more areas of sexual functioning. Mean symptom score for females was more than twice that of males. Sexual symptoms were associated with reporting health problems. Significant associations between sexual functioning and HRQOL outcomes were observed, with gender differences in strengths of association suggesting that males find sexual symptoms more distressing than do females. CONCLUSIONS: While most survivors appear to be doing well in this important life domain, some young adult survivors report sexual concerns. While female survivors may report more sexual symptoms than male survivors, males may experience more distress associated with sexual difficulties. Better-specified measures of sexual function, behavior and outcomes are needed for this young adult population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1641

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [29]Stewart AL Ware JE Measuring Functioning and Well-Being Durham and London Duke University Press 1992
  2. [31]Derogatis L BSI 18 Brief Symptom Inventory 18, Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual Minneapolis, MN NCS Pearson Inc. 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zebrack, B. J., Foley, S., Wittmann, D., & Leonard, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • U-M Rogel Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Zebrack, Brad J.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-20
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
814-822
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2137813841
Cited by
144
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA100380)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
childhood cancer survivors, sexual dysfunction, sexual function, young adults, health-related quality of life, psychosocial outcomes, psychological distress, life satisfaction, gender differences, cancer treatment side effects
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Sex Factors, Survivors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review