Cited by 37Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeSexual function and dysfunction studiesCancer survivorship and care

Sexual dysfunction in young adult survivors of childhood cancer - a population-based study

Open access
Hovén, Emma, Fagerkvist, Kristina, Jahnukainen, Kirsi, Ljungman, Lisa, Lähteenmäki, Päivi M., Axelsson, Ove, Lampic, Claudia, Wettergren, Lena·2021·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and to identify the factors associated with sexual dysfunction in young adult childhood cancer survivors. METHODS: All survivors of childhood cancer (aged 19-40 years) in Sweden were invited to this population-based study, and 2546 men and women (59%) participated. Sexual function was examined with the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure. Logistic regression was used to assess the differences between survivors and a general population sample (n = 819) and to identify the factors associated with sexual dysfunction in survivors. RESULTS: Sexual dysfunction in at least one domain was reported by 57% of female and 35% of male survivors. Among females, dysfunction was most common for Sexual interest (36%), Orgasm - ability (32%) and Vulvar discomfort - labial (19%). Among males, dysfunction was most common for the domains satisfaction with sex life (20%), Sexual interest (14%) and Erectile function (9%). Compared with the general population, male survivors more frequently reported sexual dysfunction in ≥2 domains (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03-2.71), with an increased likelihood of dysfunction regarding Orgasm - ability (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.01-3.28) and Erectile function (OR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.18-4.49). Female survivors reported more dysfunction regarding Orgasm - pleasure (9% versus 5%, OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.11-3.13). A more intensive cancer treatment, emotional distress and body image disturbance were associated with sexual dysfunction in survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the need for routine assessment of sexual health in follow-up care of childhood cancer survivors and highlight that those treated with more intensive cancer treatment and who experience concurrent psychological concerns may benefit from targeted screening and interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.014

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Strandquist J, Eriksson LE, Winterling J. Translation of selected items of the PROMIS SexFS v2.0 into Swedish. In: The second PHO conference, October 23e24. Denmark: Copenhagen; 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hovén, E., Fagerkvist, K., Jahnukainen, K., Ljungman, L., Lähteenmäki, P. M., Axelsson, O., Lampic, C., & Wettergren, L.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Hovén, Emma
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
154
Pages
147-156
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3183341192
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Barncancerfonden (PR2014-0177, PR2016-0075, PR2017-0037, TJ2014-0050, TJ2019-0045)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2017-01530, 2020-00335)
  • Cancerfonden (CAN 2013/886)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, childhood cancer survivors, young adults, sexual health, erectile function, orgasm, sexual interest, emotional distress, body image disturbance, follow-up care
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Psychological Distress, Adult, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Prevalence, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review