Cited by 43Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeTesticular diseases and treatments

Fear of recurrence and causal attributions in long-term survivors of testicular cancer

Pedersen, Anette Fischer, Rossen, Philip, Olesen, Frede, von der Maase, Hans, Vedsted, Peter·2012·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to examine the prevalence of fear of recurrence (FoR) in long-term testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) and the association between FoR and causal attributions of cancer. METHODS: Testicular cancer survivors were sampled from a clinical register and were sent a questionnaire assessing FoR, depression using Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), physical symptoms (ototoxicity, neuropathy, and Raynaud-like phenomena), and causal attributions of testicular cancer. RESULTS: There were 316 TCSs who completed the questionnaires (response rate, 65%). The mean age was 47.6 years (standard deviation (SD) = 10.9), and the mean time since diagnosis was 12.0 years (SD = 3.0). Among the TCSs, 27.9% reported FoR. Univariate analyses revealed that FoR was associated with a BDI-II sum score of ≥19 (odds ratio (OR) = 7.07, p < 0.001) and attributing the cancer disease to psychological stress (OR = 2.57, p = 0.002). A multivariate analysis revealed associations between FoR and attributing the cancer disease to psychological stress (OR = 2.35, p = 0.010) and a BDI-II sum score ≥19 (OR = 5.82, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Fear of recurrence is prevalent in long-term TCSs. The observed relationship between FoR and a psychological causal attribution is probably complex and the direction of causality may be twofold: attributing the disease to a factor that is perceived as uncontrollable in nature could induce loss of control, and high levels of FoR may increase the need to gain control over the situation by pointing out factors that could be responsible for the disease such as psychological stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.2030

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pedersen, A. F., Rossen, P., Olesen, F., von der Maase, H., & Vedsted, P.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Department of Oncology Rigshospitalet Denmark
Corresponding author
Pedersen, Anette Fischer
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-25
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1222-1228
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1495109279
Cited by
43
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Testicular diseases and treatments
Keywords
fear of recurrence, testicular cancer survivors, causal attribution, psychological stress, depression, loss of control, long-term cancer survivors, ototoxicity, neuropathy
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Regression Analysis, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Testicular Neoplasms, Causality, Prevalence, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review