Cited by 13Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Assessing cancer patients' quality of life and coping mechanisms in Radiotherapy Department of the University College Hospital, Ibadan

Asuzu, Chioma Christie, Elumelu, Theresa Nchekube·2013·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Background: Cancer is often associated with a lot of pain and suffering. These suggest that coping with the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of cancer is a major life stressor that is capable of influencing patients' quality of life (QoL). Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the relationship between cancer patients' QoL dimensions and coping strategies in the Radiotherapy Department of the University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria. Methods: Data were collected on clinic days from all available and consenting cancer patients who were receiving treatment at the radiotherapy department. Participants were informed of their right to decline to fill the questionnaires. Result: In this study, 237 cancer patients participated. They had an age range of 15 to 95 years with a mean age of 49.91 years. There was significant inverse relationship between physical well‐being with behavioural disengagement, venting, planning and self‐blame (p < 0.05); social/family well‐being has significant linear relationship with active coping, emotional support, positive reframing, instrumental support, acceptance and religion (p < 0.05); emotional well‐being has significant inverse relationship with behavioural disengagement and self‐blame (p < 0.05); functional well‐being has significant linear relationship with active coping, instrumental support and acceptance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It is important to assess cancer patients for the kind of coping strategies they are adopting to use in coping with their cancer burden, thereby guiding against lower QoL due to negative coping strategies. Intervention programmes could be developed to help cancer patients adopt more positive and effective coping strategies to improve patients' QoL. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3290

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asuzu, C. C., & Elumelu, T. N.
Affiliations
University of Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Asuzu, Chioma Christie
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-28
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
2306-2312
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1597783093
Cited by
13
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer patients, quality of life, coping strategies, radiotherapy, physical well-being, social well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, behavioral disengagement, self-blame, positive reframing, instrumental support, emotional support, acceptance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denial, Psychological, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Nigeria, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Social Support, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review