Cited by 23Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareWomen's cancer prevention and management

Gender Differences in the Use of Engagement and Disengagement Coping Strategies in Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Open access
Oppegaard, Kate, Dunn, Laura, Kober, Kord, Mackin, Lynda, Hammer, Marilyn, Conley, Yvette, Levine, Jon, Miaskowski, Christine·2020·Oncology Nursing Forum

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between gender and coping strategies in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy in outpatient settings. SAMPLE & SETTING: Women (N = 277) and men (N = 293) were recruited from two comprehensive cancer centers, one Veterans Affairs hospital, and four community-based oncology programs. METHODS & VARIABLES: Coping data were obtained from patients with gastrointestinal (n = 412) or lung (n = 158) cancer through the Brief COPE scale. RESULTS: In terms of engagement coping strategies, women reported higher scores for positive reframing, religion, and using instrumental support. Men reported higher scores for humor. In terms of disengagement coping strategies, women reported higher scores for denial, venting, and self-distraction. Men reported higher scores for substance use. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Gender-based stereotypes of emotional expectations may affect how patients express themselves and the ways in which support is offered. Clinicians should be aware of their own preconceived notions about sex and gender and reflect on how these may influence the psychosocial care they provide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/20.onf.586-594

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women with cancer had higher scores of avoidant coping strategies than males [69].

    “These results are consistent with a recent study [69] showing that women with cancer had higher scores of avoidant coping strategies than males.”

    From Psychological variables associated with quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of body image distress (2022) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results section reports that women receiving chemotherapy for gastrointestinal or lung cancer scored higher than men on three disengagement coping strategies: self-distraction, denial, and venting. The claim generalizes this to avoidant coping strategies overall; the same section reports higher substance-use scores in men and no significant difference in behavioral disengagement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Karnofsky D (1977). Performance scale. Plenum Press.
  2. Lazarus RS, & Folkman S (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oppegaard, K., Dunn, L., Kober, K., Mackin, L., Hammer, M., Conley, Y., Levine, J., & Miaskowski, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
586-594
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
OpenAlex
W3080118220
Cited by
23
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Hartford Foundation for Public Giving
  • Oncology Nursing Foundation (CA134900)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA134900, CA134900)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR016920)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
gender differences, coping strategies, engagement coping, disengagement coping, cancer patients, chemotherapy, Brief COPE scale, positive reframing, denial, humor, substance use, psychosocial care, gastrointestinal cancer, lung cancer, gender stereotypes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review