Cited by 37Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchCancer survivorship and care

“You don't know what's wrong with you”: an exploration of cancer‐related experiences in people with an intellectual disability

Open access
Flynn, Samantha, Hulbert‐Williams, Nicholas J., Hulbert‐Williams, Lee, Bramwell, Ros·2016·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Few empirical studies have explored cancer‐related experiences of people with an intellectual disability (ID), despite rising cancer incidence in this population. The present research aims to better understand the experiences of this population from multiple perspectives, generating theory and further research questions. Methods: Six people with ID and cancer, alongside 12 participants from their supportive network (including family and social and health care professionals), were interviewed; transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory. Results: People with ID were often overlooked within cancer consultations and excluded from conversations about their care and treatment‐related decisions. Caregivers (family and paid) were relied upon to facilitate communication and understanding and supplement health care professional knowledge. Caregivers' attempts to protect the patient from distress harmed communication further; our interviewees suggest that increased involvement and empowerment mediated cancer‐related distress. Where health care professionals possessed good patient‐centered skills, and additional support was offered, people with ID were more likely to engage meaningfully in their cancer‐related experience. Conclusions: Interestingly, emergent concepts were consistent with general psycho‐oncology literature; however, incidence and severity of difficulty was substantially greater in this sample. This disparity warrants further exploration, with a need for intervention research to develop effective ways of supporting health care professionals in enhancing patient‐centered skills with this population. In the clinical setting, patient involvement in health care decisions (despite problems associated with comorbidity) is imperative to optimize engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4211

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flynn, S., Hulbert‐Williams, N. J., Hulbert‐Williams, L., & Bramwell, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chester (GB)
  • Chester Research Unit for the Psychology of Health, Department of Psychology University of Chester Chester Cheshire UK
Corresponding author
Flynn, Samantha
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1198-1205
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2470314249
Cited by
37
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
intellectual disability, cancer, lived experience, patient-centered care, caregiver involvement, patient empowerment, patient decision-making, healthcare communication, cancer-related distress, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Neoplasms, Professional-Family Relations, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review