Cited by 57Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCOVID-19 and Mental HealthDental Research and COVID-19

Grappling with the “human” problem hiding behind the technology: Telehealth during and beyond COVID‐19

Open access
Sansom‐Daly, Ursula M., Bradford, Natalie·2020·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

1. Telehealth (online videoconferencing) has been used successfully with a range of adolescents and young adults (AYA) to access outpatient, clinical psychology services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. 2. Our combined, recent clinical experiences demonstrate a range of potentially sensitive clinical interactions with young people and their families can be successfully delivered and experienced using telehealth. 3. The relative lack of uptake in telehealth prior to COVID-19 requires clinicians and researchers to consider the barriers that prevented its use. 4. We argue that a key, lesser-acknowledged, barrier is the contention that telehealth is not capable of transmitting the ‘human-ness’ required to support effective interactions within psychosocial clinical care. 5. Telehealth preferences cannot be assumed for any patient/client demographic; to advance telehealth beyond COVID-19 clinical research needs to find new ways to rigorously capture and evaluate these critical experiential and relational aspects to telehealth-delivered care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5462

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sansom‐Daly, U. M., & Bradford, N.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Centre for Healthcare Transformation and School of Nursing at Centre for Children's Health Research, Centre for Children's Health Research Brisbane Queensland Australia
Corresponding author
Sansom‐Daly, Ursula M.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-13
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1404-1408
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W3041875661
Cited by
57
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Cancer Council NSW (Program Grant PG16‐02 with the support of the Est, PG16‐02)
  • Cancer Institute NSW (14/ECF/1‐11)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents and young adults, clinical psychology services, videoconferencing, psychosocial care, patient preferences, family involvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review