Cited by 21Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

From the carer’s mouth: A phenomenological exploration of carer experiences with head and neck cancer patients

Halkett, Georgia KB, Golding, Raelee M., Langbecker, Danette, White, Rohen, Jackson, Melanie, Kernutt, Elizabeth, O'Connor, Moira·2020·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective Receiving a diagnosis of head and neck cancer is devastating for patients and family carers and causes high levels of distress. Previous studies report that carer distress levels exceed that of patients, but go largely unnoticed by health professionals. To date, there is a paucity of studies that have described carers' perspectives of the lived experience of caring for a loved one diagnosed with head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of carers of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. Methods This qualitative study was informed by descriptive phenomenology. Carers of patients who had been diagnosed with head and neck cancer within the last 6 years were recruited from participating hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 carers of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. Thematic analysis was conducted to gain an understanding of participants lived experiences. Results Key themes identified were: Silent Suffering, Gamut of Emotions, Causal Attribution, Changing Priorities, Gaining Support, and Coping. The changing priorities themes highlights that carers prioritised (a) being available for their loved one and (b) taking an active role in managing head and neck cancer symptoms and side effects. Conclusions Carers of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer experience distress. Instead of seeking support, carers often elected to suffer in silence. Implications for…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5511

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 13 studies indicated the need of developing coping strategies to improve management and control of both the situation and emotional strain, and to help increase training in caregivers, thus improving self-efficacy while reducing emotional impact.

    “Thirteen studies [23,24,27,30,32,35,37,38,45,46,47,49,54] indicated the need of developing coping strategies to improve the management and control of both the situation and the emotional strain, and also to help increase training in caregivers, thus improving their self-efficacy while reducing the emotional impact.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halkett, G. K., Golding, R. M., Langbecker, D., White, R., Jackson, M., Kernutt, E., & O'Connor, M.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU)
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU)
  • WA Cancer Prevention Research Unit (WACPRU), School of Psychology Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia
Corresponding author
Halkett, Georgia KB
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-28
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1695-1703
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W3048605269
Cited by
21
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
head and neck cancer, family caregivers, caregiver distress, lived experience of caregiving, emotional experience, causal attribution, symptom management, coping, social support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Emotions, Family, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review