Cited by 103Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesMusic Therapy and Health

Anxiety, Coping Strategies, and Coping Behaviors in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

Dropkin, Mary Jo·2001·Cancer Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is reported in the scientific literature about the modulating effect of anxiety on the coping process before and after surgical treatment for head and neck cancer. OBJECTIVES: The major purpose of this article is to describe the relationships among preoperative anxiety and use of coping strategies, and postoperative self-care and resocialization behaviors in patients who sustain facial disfigurement/dysfunction with head and neck cancer surgery. METHODS: Using a prospective descriptive design, 75 (N = 75) adults who were about to sustain facial disfigurement and dysfunction associated with head and neck cancer surgery were entered into the study. The State Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire were administered to the respondents. The Disfigurement/Dysfunction Scale and Coping Behaviors Score values were calculated by the investigator. RESULTS: Self-care and anxiety were significantly correlated on postoperative day 4 (r = 2.30; p < .05) and on postoperative day 5 (r = 2.35; p < .05). For the 3 days under study, the relationship between total self-care and anxiety became stronger on postoperative day 5 (r = 2.39; p < .01), indicating that self-care on postoperative day 4 is related to reduced anxiety on postoperative day 5. In other words, self-care appears to precede reduction in anxiety in this sample. Secondly, there was a negative relationship between self-care and anxiety that increased over the early postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study prospectively documents anxiety in surgical head and neck cancer patients. The findings suggest that at a specific point in time (postoperative day 5), self-care precedes reduction in anxiety, and that this negative relationship increases over time. Additional investigation is now critical in order to describe long-term recovery after surgical treatment for head and neck cancer and to develop appropriate interventions to meet the unique needs of this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002820-200104000-00010

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dropkin, M. J.
Affiliations
Long Island University (US)
Corresponding author
Dropkin, Mary Jo
Venue
Cancer Nursing
Published
2001-04
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
143-148
ISSN
0162-220X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092653244
Cited by
103
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01nr002239-03)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR02239A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
head and neck cancer, preoperative anxiety, coping strategies, coping styles, postoperative self-care, resocialization, facial disfigurement, anxiety reduction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Body Image, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review