Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and carePsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Stress appraisal and emotion regulation mediate the association between mindfulness and affect in cancer patients: Differential mechanisms for positive and negative affect

Open access
Tungtong, Puttichai, Ranchor, Adelita V., Schroevers, Maya J.·2023·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Cancer patients are at an increased risk for affective problems, including feelings of anxiety and depression. Mindfulness has been linked to an array of benefits for affective functioning in various populations including cancer patients, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship are still poorly understood. Based on emotion‐regulation and stress‐coping models, this study examined the potential mediating role of stress appraisal and coping strategies in the associations between mindfulness and cancer patients' positive and negative affect. Methods: For this cross‐sectional study, 245 cancer patients completed self‐report questionnaires measuring mindfulness (FFMQ), positive and negative affect (PANAS), stress appraisal (SPSI‐R:S), coping through positive reappraisal and positive refocusing (CERQ), rumination (RRQ), and distraction (COPE). Serial mediation analyses were conducted using the regression‐based bootstrapping method. Results: Higher levels of mindfulness were associated with higher levels of positive affect; this relationship was mediated via stress appraisal and positive reappraisal. We also found an indirect effect from mindfulness directly via positive reappraisal to positive affect. In addition, higher levels of mindfulness were negatively associated with negative affect; this relationship was mediated via stress appraisal and rumination, with also an indirect effect from mindfulness directly via stress appraisal to negative affect. Conclusions: Results suggest that stress appraisal and distinct coping strategies mediate the relationship between mindfulness and affect. Mindfulness may provide benefits for cancer patients' affect by allowing adaptive stress appraisal and ways of coping through more positive and less negative thinking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.6201

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional results show rumination mediates the relationship between mindfulness and negative affect.

    “cross-sectional results showing rumination mediates the relationship between mindfulness and negative affect. 54”

    From Mindfulness and Psychosocial Symptoms in People with Cancer: Testing Rumination and Experiential Avoidance as Mediators, and Sex as a Moderator. (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Model 2 discussion reports a cross-sectional association between mindfulness and negative affect mediated through stress appraisal followed by rumination. The results passage reports a significant indirect effect along that serial path, but no significant indirect effect through rumination alone. The claim omits the necessary stress-appraisal step. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tungtong, P., Ranchor, A. V., & Schroevers, M. J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Tungtong, Puttichai
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-16
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
1548-1556
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W4385897715
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness, cancer patients, stress appraisal, emotion regulation, positive affect, negative affect, positive reappraisal, rumination, distraction, coping strategies, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Emotional Regulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review