Cited by 146Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Is learning mindfulness associated with improved affect after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy?

Open access
Schroevers, Maya J., Brandsma, Rob·2010·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The increased popularity of mindfulness-based interventions and the growing body of empirical evidence confirming the positive effects of these interventions on well-being warrant more research to determine if the effects are indeed related to learning mindfulness. The present study extends previous studies, by examining whether and how changes in five core aspects of mindfulness are related to changes in the report of negative and positive affect during an 8-week course of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. The study was performed in 64 individuals from the community with mild to moderate psychological problems. Data were collected by self-report questionnaires before and directly after the training. Results showed significant decreases in negative affect and increases in positive affect. We also found significant increases in four of the five aspects of mindfulness. Importantly, changes in mindfulness were significantly associated with improved affect, with a distinct pattern found for positive and negative affect. Hereby, our findings extend previous research by showing that learning distinct aspects of mindfulness is differently related to an improved positive affect and a decreased negative affect. Future randomized controlled trials with a larger sample and longer follow-up period are needed to replicate these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000712609x424195

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schroevers, M. J., & Brandsma, R.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Schroevers, Maya J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
95-107
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2157251142
Cited by
146
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, positive affect, negative affect, mindfulness training, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Health Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review