The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increasing emphasis on understanding how the cancer experience affects individuals' quality of life (QOL). The goal of this study was to assess the QOL and to identify psychosocial predictors of QOL among a large sample of patients with a variety of cancers. Specifically, we assessed the unique contribution of demographic variables, medical variables, and social support on patients' QOL and psychological adjustment. Three hundred and fifty‐one participants completed measures of social support, depression, anxiety, and QOL at their follow‐up medical visits. Analyses indicated that patients who were older and had better social support reported less anxiety (p<0.001), and patients who were older, married or who had more social support reported less depressive symptoms (p<0.01). Men, individuals whose cancer had not recurred, and those not undergoing active treatment reported better QOL in the physical health domain (p<0.05). Patients who were older, married, with more formal education, less advanced disease, and better social support reported better QOL in the mental health domain (p<0.05). Demographic variables (age, gender, marital status, education) were generally associated with measures of adjustment and QOL whereas medical variables (time since diagnosis, recurrence status, treatment variables, stage of disease) were not. Patients with more support reported less anxiety and depression and better QOL in the mental health domain, independent of demographic and medical variables. Assessing patients' level of social support may help to identify patients at risk for distress. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide
Ware, J. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,424
MCHORNEY, C. A., JOHNE, W., & ANASTASIAE, R. (1993) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006 · Cited by 6,681
Measuring the Functional Components of Social Support
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. M. (1985) · Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5115-0_5 · Cited by 2,296 · cited 2×
“The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) (Cohen et al., 1985; Cohen and Willis, 1985) is a 40-item, self-report measure that assesses individuals’ perceptions of social support availability.”
BackgroundInfluentialMotamedi, K. K., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257525 · Cited by 1,954
Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales
Bowling, A. (1991) · Cited by 1,022
Cited by
Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review
Fortin, M., Lapointe, L., Hudon, C., Vanasse, A., Ntetu, A. L., & Maltais, D. (2004) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-51 · Cited by 963
Quality of Life Among Younger Women With Breast Cancer
Avis, N. E., Crawford, S., & Manuel, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.130 · Cited by 529
Mehnert, A., Müller, D., Lehmann, C., & Koch, U. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213 · Cited by 440
Nipp, R. D., El‐Jawahri, A., Fishbein, J. N., Eusebio, J., Stagl, J. M., Gallagher, E. R., Park, E. R., Jackson, V. A., Pirl, W. F., Greer, J. A., et al. (2016) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30025 · Cited by 283
Sarcopenia Is Associated with Quality of Life and Depression in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Nipp, R. D., Fuchs, G., El-Jawahri, A., Mario, J., Troschel, F. M., Greer, J. A., Gallagher, E. R., Jackson, V. A., Kambadakone, A., Hong, T. S., et al. (2018) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0255 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, P. A., Baile, W. F., Moor, C. D., & Cohen, L.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-193
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W1991628938
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.635
- The paper
- Parker, P. A., Baile, W. F., Moor, C. D., & Cohen, L. (2003). Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.