The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linkers in the structural biology of protein–protein interactions
Open accessAbstract
Linkers or spacers are short amino acid sequences created in nature to separate multiple domains in a single protein. Most of them are rigid and function to prohibit unwanted interactions between the discrete domains. However, Gly‐rich linkers are flexible, connecting various domains in a single protein without interfering with the function of each domain. The advent of recombinant DNA technology made it possible to fuse two interacting partners with the introduction of artificial linkers. Often, independent proteins may not exist as stable or structured proteins until they interact with their binding partner, following which they gain stability and the essential structural elements. Gly‐rich linkers have been proven useful for these types of unstable interactions, particularly where the interaction is weak and transient, by creating a covalent link between the proteins to form a stable protein–protein complex. Gly‐rich linkers are also employed to form stable covalently linked dimers, and to connect two independent domains that create a ligand‐binding site or recognition sequence. The lengths of linkers vary from 2 to 31 amino acids, optimized for each condition so that the linker does not impose any constraints on the conformation or interactions of the linked partners. Various structures of covalently linked protein complexes have been described using X‐ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance and cryo‐electron microscopy techniques. In this review, we evaluate several structural studies where linkers have been used to improve protein quality, to produce stable protein–protein complexes, and to obtain protein dimers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pfam: the protein families database
Finn, R. D., Bateman, A., Clements, J., Coggill, P., Eberhardt, R. Y., Eddy, S. R., Heger, A., Hetherington, K., Holm, L., Mistry, J., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223 · Cited by 6,148
Davidsson, M., Wang, G., Aldrin-Kirk, P., Cardoso, T., Nolbrant, S., Hartnor, M., Mudannayake, J., Parmar, M., & Björklund, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1910061116 · Cited by 142
NLK interacts with 14‑3‑3ζ to restore the expression of E‑cadherin
Chen, J., Lin, Q., Ni, T., Zhao, J., Lin, F., Lu, X., Lv, Y., Ren, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, T., et al. (2020) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.2020.7557 · Cited by 4
Computational Design of a TCR-Based Bispecific Engager Targeting Cancerous KRAS G12V Mutations
Shah, N., Sharma, G., Patel, V., Wu, M., Mummadi, A., Taneja, A., Shah, M., Le, G. B., Krishna, M., & Brah, H. (2026) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c10229
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy Chichili, V. P., Kumar, V., & Sivaraman, J.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-167
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W1989873812
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linkers in the structural biology of protein–protein interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.2206
- The paper
- Reddy Chichili, V. P., Kumar, V., & Sivaraman, J. (2013). Linkers in the structural biology of protein–protein interactions. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.