The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refined structures of mouse P‐glycoprotein
Open accessAbstract
The recently determined C. elegans P‐glycoprotein (Pgp) structure revealed significant deviations compared to the original mouse Pgp structure, which suggested possible misinterpretations in the latter model. To address this concern, we generated an experimental electron density map from single‐wavelength anomalous dispersion phasing of an original mouse Pgp dataset to 3.8 Å resolution. The map exhibited significantly more detail compared to the original MAD map and revealed several regions of the structure that required de novo model building. The improved drug‐free structure was refined to 3.8 Å resolution with a 9.4 and 8.1% decrease in R work and R free , respectively, ( R work = 21.2%, R free = 26.6%) and a significant improvement in protein geometry. The improved mouse Pgp model contains ∼95% of residues in the favorable Ramachandran region compared to only 57% for the original model. The registry of six transmembrane helices was corrected, revealing amino acid residues involved in drug binding that were previously unrecognized. Registry shifts (rotations and translations) for three transmembrane (TM)4 and TM5 and the addition of three N‐terminal residues were necessary, and were validated with new mercury labeling and anomalous Fourier density. The corrected position of TM4, which forms the frame of a portal for drug entry, had backbone atoms shifted >6 Å from their original positions. The drug translocation pathway of mouse Pgp is 96% identical to human Pgp and is enriched in aromatic residues that likely play a collective role in allowing a high degree of polyspecific substrate recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3 retracted
Chang, G. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00587-4 · Cited by 259
RetractedChang, G. A., Roth, C., Reyes, C. L., Pornillos, O., Chen, Y.-J., & Chen, A. P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.314.5807.1875b · Cited by 137
RetractedChang, G. A. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.05.001 · Cited by 22
RetractedCoot : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571
PHENIX : a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Davis, I. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Kapral, G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909052925 · Cited by 23,716
Phaser crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System
DeLano, W. L. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,147
PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Davis, I. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Kapral, G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2012) · International Tables for Crystallography · doi:10.1107/97809553602060000865 · Cited by 7,334
Structure of P-Glycoprotein Reveals a Molecular Basis for Poly-Specific Drug Binding
Aller, S. G., Yu, J., Ward, A., Weng, Y., Chittaboina, S., Zhuo, R., Harrell, P. M., Trinh, Y. T., Zhang, Q., Urbatsch, I. L., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168750 · Cited by 1,929
Self-citationStructure of a bacterial multidrug ABC transporter
Dawson, R. J. P., & Locher, K. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05155 · Cited by 1,279
Cited by
Mechanistic diversity in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters.
Locher, K. P. (2016) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3216 · Cited by 804
Li, W., Zhang, H., Assaraf, Y. G., Zhao, K., Xu, X., Xie, J., Yang, D.-H., & Chen, Z.-S. (2016) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2016.05.001 · Cited by 673
Emerging Diversity in Lipid–Protein Interactions
Corradi, V., Sejdiu, B. I., Mesa-Galloso, H., Abdizadeh, H., Noskov, S. Y., Marrink, S. J., & Tieleman, D. P. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00451 · Cited by 459
Structural diversity of ABC transporters
ter Beek, J., Guskov, A., & Slotboom, D. J. (2014) · Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.201411164 · Cited by 384
Structural Basis of Substrate Recognition by the Multidrug Resistance Protein MRP1
Johnson, Z. L., & Chen, J. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.041 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Jaimes, K. F., & Aller, S. G.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-15
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-46
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2127247883
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 18.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refined structures of mouse P‐glycoprotein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.2387
- The paper
- Li, J., Jaimes, K. F., & Aller, S. G. (2014). Refined structures of mouse P‐glycoprotein. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.