Cited by 29Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Apo E: The role of conserved residues in defining function

Open access
Frieden, Carl·2015·Protein Science

Abstract

The amino acid sequences of apolipoprotein E (apoE) from 63 different mammalian species have been downloaded from the protein database. The sequences were compared to human apoE4 to determine conserved and non‐conserved sequences of amino acids. ApoE4 is the major risk factor for the development of late onset Alzheimer's disease while apoE3, which differs from apoE4 by a single amino acid change at position 112, poses little or no risk for the development of this disease. Thus, the two proteins appear to be structurally and functionally different. Seven highly conserved regions, representing approximately 47 amino acids (of 299) have been found. These regions are distributed throughout the protein and reflect ligand binding sites as well as regions proposed to be involved in the propagation of the cysteine–arginine change at position 112 to distant regions of the protein in the N‐ and C‐terminal domains. Highly non‐conserved regions are at the N‐ and C‐terminal ends of the apoE protein.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.2597

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ApoE-knockout is a more suitable model than ApoE4 mutants to study dyslipidemia because the E4 allele manifests an isoform-specific structural conformation that produces allele-specific effects.

    “To answer this question, ApoE-knockout is a more suitable model than ApoE4 mutants to study dyslipidemia because the E4 allele manifests an isoform-specific structural conformation that produces allele-specific effects.”

    From Dyslipidemia-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunctions in the Brains Does Not Reach Pathological Levels in the ApoE-Knockout Mice (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe structural and functional differences between apoE isoforms, but the Discussion treats the nature of their conformational differences as an open question. The paper does not compare ApoE-knockout and ApoE4-mutant models or recommend either for studying dyslipidemia. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some ApoE4 mouse phenotypes are believed to arise from an allele-specific conformation of ApoE4.

    “Some of these phenotypes are believed to arise from an allele-specific conformation of ApoE4: a unique arginine at position 112 (cysteine in the other two isoforms) shifts the hinge region of the protein, enabling the N-terminal domain (residues 1–167) to directly interact with the C-terminal domain (residues 206–299) [29].”

    From Dyslipidemia-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunctions in the Brains Does Not Reach Pathological Levels in the ApoE-Knockout Mice (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction identifies arginine at position 112 as distinctive to ApoE4, and “The allosteric pathway” proposes that a change there propagates a structural difference toward the C-terminal domain. The Discussion also describes N- and C-terminal interactions. Our copy does not connect this mechanism to the cited mouse phenotypes or say that arginine 112 shifts a hinge region to enable those interactions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA (1993) Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. Science 261:921-923.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frieden, C.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Frieden, Carl
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-09
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
138-144
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W1559890486
Cited by
29
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RF1AG044331)
  • BrightFocus Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, APOE3, conserved residues, sequence conservation, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, ligand binding sites, protein structure-function relationship, N-terminal domain, C-terminal domain, interspecies sequence comparison
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Anticoagulants, Apolipoproteins E, Binding Sites, Heparin, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Receptors, LDL, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Conserved Sequence, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review