The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular mechanisms of vancomycin resistance
Open accessAbstract
Vancomycin and related glycopeptides are drugs of last resort for the treatment of severe infections caused by Gram‐positive bacteria such as Enterococcus species, Staphylococcus aureus, and Clostridium difficile. Vancomycin was long considered immune to resistance due to its bactericidal activity based on binding to the bacterial cell envelope rather than to a protein target as is the case for most antibiotics. However, two types of complex resistance mechanisms, each comprised of a multi‐enzyme pathway, emerged and are now widely disseminated in pathogenic species, thus threatening the clinical efficiency of vancomycin. Vancomycin forms an intricate network of hydrogen bonds with the d‐Ala‐d‐Ala region of Lipid II, interfering with the peptidoglycan layer maturation process. Resistance to vancomycin involves degradation of this natural precursor and its replacement with d‐Ala‐d‐lac or d‐Ala‐d‐Ser alternatives to which vancomycin has low affinity. Through extensive research over 30 years after the initial discovery of vancomycin resistance, remarkable progress has been made in molecular understanding of the enzymatic cascades responsible. Progress has been driven by structural studies of the key components of the resistance mechanisms which provided important molecular understanding such as, for example, the ability of this cascade to discriminate between vancomycin sensitive and resistant peptidoglycan precursors. Important structural insights have been also made into the molecular evolution of vancomycin resistance enzymes. Altogether this molecular data can accelerate inhibitor discovery and optimization efforts to reverse vancomycin resistance. Here, we overview our current understanding of this complex resistance mechanism with a focus on the structural and molecular aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pfam protein families database in 2019
El-Gebali, S., Mistry, J., Bateman, A., Eddy, S. R., Luciani, A., Potter, S. C., Qureshi, M., Richardson, L. J., Salazar, G. A., Smart, A., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky995 · Cited by 4,602
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
Arthur, M., Molinas, C., & Courvalin, P. (1992) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.174.8.2582-2591.1992 · Cited by 338
Cited by
Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited
Darby, E. M., Trampari, E., Siasat, P., Gaya, M. S., Alav, I., Webber, M. A., & Blair, J. M. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y · Cited by 1,398
Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives
Merenstein, D., Pot, B., Leyer, G., Ouwehand, A. C., Preidis, G. A., Elkins, C. A., Hill, C., Lewis, Z. T., Shane, A. L., Zmora, N., et al. (2023) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2023.2185034 · Cited by 481
Bettera, L., Levante, A., Bancalari, E., Bottari, B., Cirlini, M., Neviani, E., & Gatti, M. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12213949 · Cited by 10
Burroughs, A. M., Nicastro, G. G., & Aravind, L. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108061 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Stogios, P. J., & Savchenko, A.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-23
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 654-669
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2998110188
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.