Cited by 3Protein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pipeline for transferring annotations between proteins beyond globular domains

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

DisProt is the primary repository of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs). This database is manually curated and the annotations there have strong experimental support. Currently, DisProt contains a relatively small number of proteins highlighting the importance of transferring annotations regarding verified disorder state and corresponding functions to homologous proteins in other species. In such a way, providing them with highly valuable information to better understand their biological roles. While the principles and practicalities of homology transfer are well‐established for globular proteins, these are largely lacking for disordered proteins. We used DisProt to evaluate the transferability of the annotation terms to orthologous proteins. For each protein, we looked for their orthologs, with the assumption that they will have a similar function. Then, for each protein and their orthologs, we made multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Disordered sequences are fast evolving and can be hard to align, therefore, we implemented alignment quality control steps ensuring robust alignments before mapping the annotations. We have designed a pipeline to obtain good‐quality MSAs and to transfer annotations from any protein to their orthologs. Applying the pipeline to DisProt proteins, from the 1731 entries with 5623 annotations, we can reach 97,555 orthologs and transfer a total of 301,190 terms by homology. We also provide a web server for consulting the results of DisProt proteins and execute the pipeline for any other protein. The server Homology Transfer IDP (HoTIDP) is accessible at http://hotidp.leloir.org.ar .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4655

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1007 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/nar/gkab408 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/s12859-020-03855-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp651 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty121 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/gky1068 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1508380112 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1058 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/gkab1082 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/s12864-020-6707-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/pro.3290 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1113 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018093 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5187 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
  19. YachdavG WilzbachS RauscherB SheridanR SillitoeI ProcterJ et al.MSAViewer: interactive JavaScript visualization of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics:btw474.2016. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Martínez‐Pérez, E., Pajkos, M., Tosatto, S. C. E., Gibson, T. J., Dosztanyi, Z., & Marino‐Buslje, C.
Affiliations
  • Fundación Instituto Leloir (AR)
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Department of Biochemistry Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
Corresponding author
Marino‐Buslje, Cristina
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-19
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
e4655-e4655
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4376129164
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, H2020, 778247, H2020-MSCA, H2020 MSCA Rise)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (H2020-MSCA-RISE)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020-MSCA, H2020-MSCA-RISE, 778247)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, annotation transfer, orthologs, DisProt, multiple sequence alignment, protein annotation
MeSH terms
Databases, Factual, Sequence Alignment, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review