Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Helix propagation and N‐cap propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine‐based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol

Open access
Rohl, Carol A., Chakrabartty, Avijit, Baldwin, Robert L.·1996·Protein Science

Abstract

The helix propagation and N‐cap propensities of the amino acids have been measured in alanine‐based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol (40% TFE) to determine if this helix‐stabilizing solvent uniformly affects all amino acids. The propensities in 40% TFE are compared with revised values of the helix parameters of alanine‐based peptides in water. Revision of the propensities in water is the result of redefining the capping statistical weights and evaluating the helix nucleation constant with N‐capping explicitly included in the helix‐coil model. The propagation propensities of all amino acids increase in 40% TFE relative to water, but the increases are highly variable. In water, all β‐branched and β‐substituted amino acids are helix breakers. In 40% TFE, the propagation propensities of the nonpolar amino acids increase greatly, leaving charged and neutral polar, β‐substituted amino acids as helix breakers. Glycine and proline are strong helix breakers in both solvents. Free energy differences for helix propagation (ΔΔ G) between alanine and other nonpolar amino acids are twice as large in water as predicted from side‐chain conformational entropies, but ΔΔG values in 40% TFE are close to those predicted from side‐chain entropies. This dependence of ΔΔ G on the solvent points to a specific role of water in determining the relative helix propensities of the nonpolar amino acids. The N‐cap propensities converge toward a common value in 40% TFE, suggesting that differential solvation by water contributes to the diversity of N‐cap values shown by the amino acids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.5560051225

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Rohl, C. A., Chakrabartty, A., & Baldwin, R. L.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-12
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
2623-2637
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W2114277014
Cited by
256
References
45
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Helix propagation and N‐cap propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine‐based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560051225
The paper
Rohl, C. A., Chakrabartty, A., & Baldwin, R. L. (1996). Helix propagation and N‐cap propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine‐based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560051225

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.