The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerations
Abstract
The technique for radical retropubic prostatectomy has been modified to avoid injury to the branches of the pelvic plexus that innervate the corpora cavernosa. The surgical procedure is based on an understanding of the anatomical relationships between the branches of the pelvic plexus that innervate the corpora cavernosa, the capsular branches of the prostatic vessels that provide the scaffolding for these nerves, and the lateral pelvic fascia. The modifications involve two steps in the procedure: 1) the incision in the lateral pelvic fascia is placed anterior to the neurovascular bundle, which is located dorsolateral to the prostate along the pelvic sidewall; 2) the lateral pedicle is divided close to the prostate to avoid injury to the branches of the pelvic plexus that accompany the capsular vessels of the prostate. Pathologic evaluation of 16 prostatic specimens removed by this modified procedure demonstrated no compromise in the adequacy of the surgical margins. Postoperative sexual function was evaluated in 12 men who underwent the procedure 2‐10 months previously. All have experienced erections and six have achieved successful vaginal penetration and orgasm. Of the six patients with sexual partners who have been followed 6 months or longer, five (83%) are fully potent. These data indicate that it is possible to cure localized prostatic cancer with surgery and maintain postoperative sexual function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Walsh first described the technique for sparing the bilateral neurovascular bundles to better preserve erectile function (Walsh et al 1983), and a bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy (BNSRP) is the surgical standard for prostate cancer today.”
From Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (2008) · cites this paper as Walsh et al 1983
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A history of prostate cancer treatment.
Denmeade, S. R., & Isaacs, J. T. (2002) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc801 · Cited by 591
Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Different View
Geary, E. S., Dendinger, T. E., Freiha, F. S., & Stamey, T. A. (1995) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67251-3 · Cited by 189
Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction
Coward, R., & Carson, C. (2008) · Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management · doi:10.2147/tcrm.s3336 · Cited by 138
Sivarajan, G., Prabhu, V., Taksler, G. B., Laze, J., & Lepor, H. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.019 · Cited by 84
Self-citationMantz, C. A., Song, P., Farhangi, E., Nautiyal, J., Awan, A., Ignacio, L., Weichselbaum, R., & Vijayakumar, S. (1997) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00555-x · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, P. C., Lepor, H., & Eggleston, J. C.
- Venue
- The Prostate
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-485
- ISSN
- 0270-4137 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0045
- OpenAlex
- W2134446930
- Cited by
- 1,047
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.