Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Response of glandular versus basal rat ventral prostatic epithelial cells to androgen withdrawal and replacement

English, Hugh F., Santen, Richard J., Lsaacs, John T.·1987·The Prostate

Abstract

Light microscope autoradiography was utilized to investigate the separate proliferative activities of the basal and glandular cell types during androgen‐mediated restoration of the ventral prostatic epithelium in castrated rats. Our objective was to determine whether the proliferative population of the prostatic epithelium is restricted to the basal cell subtype under these experimental conditions. In the intact animal, substantial numbers of basal as well as glandular cells were found to be proliferating. The basal cell labeling index (LI) was 3.75%±0.3% or 1.85±0.4 × 10 5 labeled cells per prostate. For the glandular cells the comparable figures were 0.38% and 3.32±1.5 × 10 5. Seven days after surgical castration, both subtypes persisted. However, only the numbers of glandular cells were found to be significantly reduced (66% decrease). When androgens were replaced by daily subcutaneous injection (testosterone propionate, 2 mg/0.2 ml sesame oil), both cell types responded with significantly increased proliferation. The temporal pattern of response displayed by each cell type was very similar. A greater proportion of basal than glandular cells responded, ie, 28% vs 11% LI. However, in terms of approximate numbers of cells labeled during the peak response, the value for the glandular cells was larger, ie, 2.4 vs 1.1 × 10 6 labeled cells. These data clearly indicate that under normal conditions as well as during testosterone stimulation, basal cells are not the sole population of proliferating cells in the prostatic epithelium. Thus, basal cells, as a distinct morphologic population, are not homogeneously undifferentiated stem cells which give rise to differentiated and nonproliferating glandular epithelial cells. Aspects of these data can nevertheless be interpreted to support the idea that the prostatic epithelium is maintained by a single cell lineage system in which the stem cells comprise a subpopulation of the basal cells. Alternatively, the two populations may be separate and distinct as no data are presented which unequivocally links the two cell types in a precursor‐progeny relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pros.2990110304

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
English, H. F., Santen, R. J., & Lsaacs, J. T.
Venue
The Prostate
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
229-242
ISSN
  • 0270-4137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0045
OpenAlex
W2064589748
Cited by
354
References
0
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of glandular versus basal rat ventral prostatic epithelial cells to androgen withdrawal and replacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pros.2990110304
The paper
English, H. F., Santen, R. J., & Lsaacs, J. T. (1987). Response of glandular versus basal rat ventral prostatic epithelial cells to androgen withdrawal and replacement. The Prostate. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990110304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.