The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks
Abstract
Complex cellular processes are modular and are accomplished by the concerted action of functional modules (Ravasz et al., Science 2002;297:1551–1555; Hartwell et al., Nature 1999;402:C47–52). These modules encompass groups of genes or proteins involved in common elementary biological functions. One important and largely unsolved goal of functional genomics is the identification of functional modules from genomewide information, such as transcription profiles or protein interactions. To cope with the ever‐increasing volume and complexity of protein interaction data (Bader et al., Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:242–245; Xenarios et al., Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:303–305), new automated approaches for pattern discovery in these densely connected interaction networks are required (Ravasz et al., Science 2002;297:1551–1555; Bader and Hogue, Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:991–997; Snel et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5890–5895). In this study, we successfully isolate 1046 functional modules from the known protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involving 8046 individual pair‐wise interactions by using an entirely automated and unsupervised graph clustering algorithm. This systems biology approach is able to detect many well‐known protein complexes or biological processes, without reference to any additional information. We use an extensive statistical validation procedure to establish the biological significance of the detected modules and explore this complex, hierarchical network of modular interactions from which pathways can be inferred. Proteins 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138
Cited by
Schaeffer, S. E. (2007) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2007.05.001 · Cited by 1,639
Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks
Han, J.-D. J., Dupuy, D., Bertin, N., Cusick, M. E., & Vidal, M. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1116 · Cited by 344
Freeman, T. C., Goldovsky, L., Brosch, M., van Dongen, S., Mazière, P., Grocock, R. J., Freilich, S., Thornton, J., & Enright, A. J. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030206 · Cited by 248
Self-citationPathway information for systems biology
Cary, M. P., Bader, G. D., & Sander, C. (2005) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.005 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira‐Leal, J. B., Enright, A. J., & Ouzounis, C. A.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-03
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-57
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2100585269
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.10505
- The paper
- Pereira‐Leal, J. B., Enright, A. J., & Ouzounis, C. A. (2004). Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.