The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins
Abstract
Owing to the use of evolutionary information and advanced machine learning protocols, secondary structures of amino acid residues in proteins can be predicted from the primary sequence with more than 75% per‐residue accuracy for the 3‐state (i.e., helix, β‐strand, and coil) classification problem. In this work we investigate whether further progress may be achieved by incorporating the relative solvent accessibility (RSA) of an amino acid residue as a fingerprint of the overall topology of the protein. Toward that goal, we developed a novel method for secondary structure prediction that uses predicted RSA in addition to attributes derived from evolutionary profiles. Our general approach follows the 2‐stage protocol of Rost and Sander, with a number of Elman‐type recurrent neural networks (NNs) combined into a consensus predictor. The RSA is predicted using our recently developed regression‐based method that provides real‐valued RSA, with the overall correlation coefficients between the actual and predicted RSA of about 0.66 in rigorous tests on independent control sets. Using the predicted RSA, we were able to improve the performance of our secondary structure prediction by up to 1.4% and achieved the overall per‐residue accuracy between 77.0% and 78.4% for the 3‐state classification problem on different control sets comprising, together, 603 proteins without homology to proteins included in the training. The effects of including solvent accessibility depend on the quality of RSA prediction. In the limit of perfect prediction (i.e., when using the actual RSA values derived from known protein structures), the accuracy of secondary structure prediction increases by up to 4%. We also observed that projecting real‐valued RSA into 2 discrete classes with the commonly used threshold of 25% RSA decreases the classification accuracy for secondary structure prediction. While the level of improvement of secondary structure prediction may be different for prediction protocols that implicitly account for RSA in other ways, we conclude that an increase in the 3‐state classification accuracy may be achieved when combining RSA with a state‐of‐the‐art protocol utilizing evolutionary profiles. The new method is available through a Web server at http://sable.cchmc.org. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & AU (1986) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · Cited by 15,686
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,000
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
Jones, D. T. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091 · Cited by 5,449
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“…al. 26 In addition we used the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) defined for each 2-class problem (e.g., MCC H for H vs other classes’ problems), 35 with the overall MCC coefficient for the 3-class problem defined as the geometric average of the MCC coefficients for the 3 different 2-class…”
MethodA direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm
Riedmiller, M., & Braun, H. (2002) · IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1993.298623 · Cited by 3,917
Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure at Better than 70% Accuracy
Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1413 · Cited by 2,910
Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies.
Karplus, K., Barrett, C., & Hughey, R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.10.846 · Cited by 1,102
JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server.
Cuff, J. A., Clamp, M. E., Siddiqui, A. S., Finlay, M., & Barton, G. J. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.10.892 · Cited by 1,006
Cuff, J. A., & Barton, G. J. (2000) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics · doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20000815)40:3<502::aid-prot170>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 770
Pollastri, G., Przybylski, D., Rost, B., & Baldi, P. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10082 · Cited by 743
Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families
Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1994) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340200303 · Cited by 665
Review: Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Continues to Rise
Rost, B. (2001) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1006/jsbi.2001.4336 · Cited by 540
Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction
Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Frasconi, P., Soda, G., & Pollastri, G. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.11.937 · Cited by 497
Zemla, A., Venclovas, ?., Fidelis, K., & Rost, B. (1999) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990201)34:2<220::aid-prot7>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 372
Benson, D. A. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg057 · Cited by 312
Bystroff, C., Thorsson, V., & Baker, D. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3837 · Cited by 309
Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks–based regression
Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., & Meller, J. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20176 · Cited by 273
Self-citationPrediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins
Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10069 · Cited by 249
Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves
Przybylski, D., & Rost, B. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10029 · Cited by 206
CAFASP2: The second critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods
Fischer, D., Elofsson, A., Rychlewski, L., Pazos, F., Valencia, A., Rost, B., Ortiz, A. R., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2001) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics · doi:10.1002/prot.10036 · Cited by 198
Continuum secondary structure captures protein flexibility.
Andersen, C. A., Palmer, A., Brunak, S., & Rost, B. (2002) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00700-1 · Cited by 153
EID: the Exon-Intron Database--an exhaustive database of protein-coding intron-containing genes
Saxonov, S., Daizadeh, I., Fedorov, A., & Gilbert, W. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.185 · Cited by 137
Prediction of protein secondary structure at 80% accuracy
Petersen, T. N., Lundegaard, C., Nielsen, M., Bohr, H. G., Bohr, J., Brunak, S., Gippert, G. P., & Lund, O. (2000) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · Cited by 133
Linear programming optimization and a double statistical filter for protein threading protocols
Meller, J., & Elber, R. (2001) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.1145 · Cited by 123
Self-citationLinear Regression Models for Solvent Accessibility Prediction in Proteins
Wagner, M., Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., & Meller, J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2005.12.355 · Cited by 116
Self-citationNETASA: neural network based prediction of solvent accessibility
Ahmad, S., & Gromiha, M. M. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.6.819 · Cited by 103
Protein structure prediction in 2002
Schonbrun, J., Wedemeyer, W. J., & Baker, D. A. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00336-6 · Cited by 92
Comparison of performance in successive CASP experiments
Venclovas, ?., Zemla, A. T., Fidelis, K. A., & Moult, J. (2001) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10053 · Cited by 78
The Use of Amino Acid Patterns of Classified Helices and Strands in Secondary Structure Prediction
Zhu, Z., & Blundell, T. L. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0397 · Cited by 42
Environmental features are important in determining protein secondary structure
MACDONALD, J. R., & Johnson, W. C. (2001) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.420101 · Cited by 37
Cited by
The Genetic Basis for Bacterial Mercury Methylation
Parks, J. M., Johs, A., Podar, M., Bridou, R., Hurt, R. A., Smith, S. D., Tomanicek, S. J., Qian, Y., Brown, S. D., Brandt, C. C., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230667 · Cited by 965
Ali, S., Hassan, M., Islam, A., & Ahmad, F. (2014) · Current Protein & Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/1389203715666140327114232 · Cited by 447
Structure of activated transcription complex Pol II–DSIF–PAF–SPT6
Vos, S. M., Farnung, L., Boehning, M., Wigge, C., Linden, A., Urlaub, H., & Cramer, P. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0440-4 · Cited by 432
Crystal Structure of the CSL-Notch-Mastermind Ternary Complex Bound to DNA
Wilson, J. J., & Kovall, R. A. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.035 · Cited by 371
Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks–based regression
Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., & Meller, J. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20176 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., & Meller, J.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-14
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 467-475
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2013734705
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
