The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of flexible protein–protein docking
Open accessAbstract
Treating flexibility in molecular docking is a major challenge in cell biology research. Here we describe the background and the principles of existing flexible protein–protein docking methods, focusing on the algorithms and their rational. We describe how protein flexibility is treated in different stages of the docking process: in the preprocessing stage, rigid and flexible parts are identified and their possible conformations are modeled. This preprocessing provides information for the subsequent docking and refinement stages. In the docking stage, an ensemble of pre‐generated conformations or the identified rigid domains may be docked separately. In the refinement stage, small‐scale movements of the backbone and side‐chains are modeled and the binding orientation is improved by rigid‐body adjustments. For clarity of presentation, we divide the different methods into categories. This should allow the reader to focus on the most suitable method for a particular docking problem. Proteins 2008. Published Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics
Tsallis, C. (1988) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01016429 · Cited by 9,589
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Self-citationStructured disorder and conformational selection
Tsai, C., Ma, B., Sham, Y. Y., Kumar, S., & Nussinov, R. (2001) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.1107 · Cited by 202 · cited 1×
“7,8 The analysis can also identify possible hinge locations.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking
Kozakov, D., Hall, D. R., Xia, B., Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., & Vajda, S. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · Cited by 3,310
The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition
Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R., & Wright, P. E. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.232 · Cited by 2,008
Self-citationImproved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,022
Tuncbag, N., Gursoy, A., Nussinov, R., & Keskin, O. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.367 · Cited by 263
Self-citationComputational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184
“15,16,25,35 In addition, the de novo design of protein – protein interactions requires docking or modeling of new protein – protein interfaces.”
BackgroundDetection of Orexin A Neuropeptide in Biological Fluids Using a Zinc Oxide Field Effect Transistor
Hagen, J., Lyon, W., Chushak, Y., Tomczak, M., Naik, R., Stone, M., & Kelley-Loughnane, N. (2013) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/cn300159e · Cited by 22
Accelerated Structural Prediction of Flexible Protein–Ligand Complexes: The SLICE Method
McFarlane, J. M. B., Krause, K. D., & Paci, I. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00688 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrusier, N., Mashiach, E., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-289
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2152872596
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
