The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virtual screening using molecular simulations
Open accessAbstract
Effective virtual screening relies on our ability to make accurate prediction of protein‐ligand binding, which remains a great challenge. In this work, utilizing the molecular‐mechanics Poisson‐Boltzmann (or Generalized Born) surface area approach, we have evaluated the binding affinity of a set of 156 ligands to seven families of proteins, trypsin β, thrombin α, cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK), cAMP‐dependent kinase (PKA), urokinase‐type plasminogen activator, β‐glucosidase A, and coagulation factor Xa. The effect of protein dielectric constant in the implicit‐solvent model on the binding free energy calculation is shown to be important. The statistical correlations between the binding energy calculated from the implicit‐solvent approach and experimental free energy are in the range of 0.56–0.79 across all the families. This performance is better than that of typical docking programs especially given that the latter is directly trained using known binding data whereas the molecular mechanics is based on general physical parameters. Estimation of entropic contribution remains the barrier to accurate free energy calculation. We show that the traditional rigid rotor harmonic oscillator approximation is unable to improve the binding free energy prediction. Inclusion of conformational restriction seems to be promising but requires further investigation. On the other hand, our preliminary study suggests that implicit‐solvent based alchemical perturbation, which offers explicit sampling of configuration entropy, can be a viable approach to significantly improve the prediction of binding free energy. Overall, the molecular mechanics approach has the potential for medium to high‐throughput computational drug discovery. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Self-citationKollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication
von Itzstein, M., Wu, W.-Y., Kok, G. B., Pegg, M. S., Dyason, J. C., Jin, B., Van Phan, T., Smythe, M. L., White, H. F., Oliver, S. W., et al. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363418a0 · Cited by 1,862
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationThe PDBbind database: methodologies and updates
Wang, R., Fang, X., Lu, Y., Yang, C.-Y., & Wang, S. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm048957q · Cited by 933
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
Wang, R., Lu, Y., & Wang, S. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0203783 · Cited by 849
Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)
Hu, L., Benson, M. L., Smith, R. D., Lerner, M. G., & Carlson, H. A. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20512 · Cited by 328
Cited by
g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS Tool for High-Throughput MM-PBSA Calculations
Kumari, R., Kumar, R., Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium, & Lynn, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500020m · Cited by 4,882
Kong, R., Liu, T., Zhu, X., Ahmad, S., Williams, A. L., Phan, A. T., Zhao, H., Scott, J. E., Yeh, L.-A., & Wong, S. T. C. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0395 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, T., Wu, J. C., Yan, C., Wang, Y., Luo, R., Gonzales, M. B., Dalby, K. N., & Ren, P.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1940-1951
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2112855704
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virtual screening using molecular simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.23018
- The paper
- Yang, T., Wu, J. C., Yan, C., Wang, Y., Luo, R., Gonzales, M. B., Dalby, K. N., & Ren, P. (2011). Virtual screening using molecular simulations. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.23018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.