Cited by 169Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Perturbing the energy landscape for improved packing during computational protein design

Open access
Maguire, Jack B., Haddox, Hugh K., Strickland, Devin, Halabiya, Samer F., Coventry, Brian, Griffin, Jermel R., Pulavarti, Surya V. S. R. K, Cummins, Matthew +6 more·2021·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

The FastDesign protocol in the molecular modeling program Rosetta iterates between sequence optimization and structure refinement to stabilize de novo designed protein structures and complexes. FastDesign has been used previously to design novel protein folds and assemblies with important applications in research and medicine. To promote sampling of alternative conformations and sequences, FastDesign includes stages where the energy landscape is smoothened by reducing repulsive forces. Here, we discover that this process disfavors larger amino acids in the protein core because the protein compresses in the early stages of refinement. By testing alternative ramping strategies for the repulsive weight, we arrive at a scheme that produces lower energy designs with more native‐like sequence composition in the protein core. We further validate the protocol by designing and experimentally characterizing over 4000 proteins and show that the new protocol produces higher stability proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.26030

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using fragment assembly, piecewise fragment assembly and helical extension, the authors designed a large set of miniproteins that ranged in length from 50 to 65 amino acids and contained larger hydrophobic cores than previous miniprotein scaffold libraries.

    “Using fragment assembly7, piecewise fragment assembly8 and helical extension9, we designed a large set of miniproteins that ranged in length from 50 to 65 amino acids and contained larger hydrophobic cores than previous miniprotein scaffold libraries1.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maguire, J. B., Haddox, H. K., Strickland, D., Halabiya, S. F., Coventry, B., Griffin, J. R., Pulavarti, S. V. S. R. K., Cummins, M., Thieker, D. F., Klavins, E., Szyperski, T., DiMaio, F., Baker, D., & Kuhlman, B.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhlman, Brian
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-11
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
436-449
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W3109508638
Cited by
169
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750‐17‐C‐0219)
  • The National Cancer Institute (T32CA009156)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM123089, R35GM131923)
  • National Science Foundation (MBC1615570)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
computational protein design, protein packing, protein stability, sequence optimization, structure refinement, Rosetta
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Folding, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Protein Stability, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review