Cited by 1Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ankh‐Score Produces Better Sequence Alignments Than AlphaFold3

Open access
Malec, Julia, Rusen, Karina, Golding, G. Brian, Ilie, Lucian·2026·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein sequence alignment is one of the most fundamental procedures in bioinformatics. Due to its many downstream applications, improvements to this procedure are of great importance. We consider two revolutionary concepts that emerged recently as candidates for improving the state‐of‐the‐art alignment methods: AlphaFold and protein language models such as Ankh, ProtT5, or ESM‐C. Alignment improvements can come from the structural alignment of AlphaFold‐predicted structures or the scoring based on the similarity of protein embeddings produced by the protein language models. Thorough comparison on many domains from BAliBASE and CDD demonstrates that the Ankh‐score method produces much better sequence alignments than the structural alignments using US‐align of AlphaFold3‐predicted structures. Both are better than the traditional method using BLOSUM matrices. This suggests that Ankh embeddings may possess certain information that is not available in the AlphaFold3‐predicted structures. The alignment software is freely available as a web server at e‐score.csd.uwo.ca and as source code at github.com/lucian‐ilie/E‐score .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.70143

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102372 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Elnaggar A., 2023, Ankh: Optimized Protein Language Model Unlocks General‐Purpose Modelling, arXiv, 2301.06568 · arXiv
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/s41467-021-23303-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz595 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bib/bbab502 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad738 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.167963 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102539 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/prot.26392 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90398-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad579 · DOI
  18. McWhite C. D., 2023, Leveraging Protein Language Models for Accurate Multiple Sequence Alignments, Genome Research, 33, 1145
  19. 10.1186/s12859-024-05699-5 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/bib/bbae178 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/prot.20527 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/nar/gku1221 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr701 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nargab/lqae150 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5080 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/gky1130 · DOI
  33. DeLano W. L., 2002, Pymol: An Open‐Source Molecular Graphics Tool, CCP4 News Protein Crystallography, 40, 82

Metadata

Authors
Malec, J., Rusen, K., Golding, G. B., & Ilie, L.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ilie, Lucian
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-05-03
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
1631-1643
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W7160150235
Cited by
1
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN‐2021‐03978, RGPIN‐2020‐05733)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein sequence alignment, AlphaFold3, protein language models, structural alignment, alignment scoring, BAliBASE, CDD
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Software, Sequence Alignment, Protein Folding, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review