Cited by 81Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsEnzyme Structure and Function

AlphaFold illuminates half of the dark human proteins

Open access
Binder, Jessica L., Berendzen, Joel, Stevens, Amy O., He, Yi, Wang, Jian, Dokholyan, Nikolay V., Oprea, Tudor I.·2022·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

We investigate the use of confidence scores to evaluate the accuracy of a given AlphaFold (AF2) protein model for drug discovery. Prediction of accuracy is improved by not considering confidence scores below 80 due to the effects of disorder. On a set of recent crystal structures, 95% are likely to have accurate folds. Conformational discordance in the training set has a much more significant effect on accuracy than sequence divergence. We propose criteria for models and residues that are possibly useful for virtual screening. Based on these criteria, AF2 provides models for half of understudied (dark) human proteins and two-thirds of residues in those models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102372

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]National Center for Biotechnology Information. [ cited 16 Sep 2021]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Binder, J. L., Berendzen, J., Stevens, A. O., He, Y., Wang, J., Dokholyan, N. V., & Oprea, T. I.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Oprea, Tudor I.
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
74
Pages
102372
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224126566
Cited by
81
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of New Mexico (U24CA224370)
  • National Science Foundation (2137558, DGE-1939267)
  • Passano Foundation (R35 GM134864)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, confidence scores, intrinsically disordered proteins, sequence divergence, virtual screening, drug discovery, model accuracy assessment
MeSH terms
Furylfuramide, Humans, Proteins, Protein Folding, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review