The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Herbicide‐resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides
Abstract
The adoption of genetically modified (GM) crops has increased dramatically during the last 3 years, and currently over 52 million hectares of GM crops are planted world‐wide. Approximately 41 million hectares of GM crops planted are herbicide‐resistant crops, which includes an estimated 33.3 million hectares of herbicide‐resistant soybean. Herbicide‐resistant maize, canola, cotton and soybean accounted for 77% of the GM crop hectares in 2001. However, sugarbeet, wheat, and as many as 14 other crops have transgenic herbicide‐resistant cultivars that may be commercially available in the near future. There are many risks associated with the production of GM and herbicide‐resistant crops, including problems with grain contamination, segregation and introgression of herbicide‐resistant traits, marketplace acceptance and an increased reliance on herbicides for weed control. The latter issue is represented in the occurrence of weed population shifts, the evolution of herbicide‐resistant weed populations and herbicide‐resistant crops becoming volunteer weeds. Another issue is the ecological impact that simple weed management programs based on herbicide‐resistant crops have on weed communities. Asiatic dayflower (Commelina cumminus L) common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L) and wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus L) are reported to be increasing in prominence in some agroecosystems due to the simple and significant selection pressure brought to bear by herbicide‐resistant crops and the concomitant use of the herbicide. Finally, evolution of herbicide‐resistant weed populations attributable to the herbicide‐resistant crop/herbicide program has been observed. Examples of herbicide‐resistant weeds include populations of horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L) Cronq) resistant to N‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine (glyphosate). An important question is whether or not these problems represent significant economic issues for future agriculture. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Partel, V., Charan Kakarla, S., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2019) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.048 · Cited by 429
Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants
Andow, D. A., & Zwahlen, C. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00846.x · Cited by 327
Crop yield and weed management in rainfed conservation agriculture
Farooq, M., Flower, K. C., Jabran, K., Wahid, A., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2011) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.10.001 · Cited by 274
Meftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
(GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O. (2011) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2480 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Owen, M. D., & Zelaya, I. A.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-25
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-311
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2055178126
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Herbicide‐resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1015
- The paper
- Owen, M. D., & Zelaya, I. A. (2005). Herbicide‐resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.