The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and evaluation of a low-cost and smart technology for precision weed management utilizing artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Most conventional sprayers apply agrochemicals uniformly, despite the fact that distribution of weeds is typically patchy, resulting in wastage of valuable compounds, increased costs, crop damage risk, pest resistance to chemicals, environmental pollution and contamination of products. To reduce these negative impacts, a smart sprayer was designed and developed utilizing machine vision and artificial intelligence to distinguish target weeds from non-target objects (e.g. vegetable crops) and precisely spray on the desired target/location. Two different experimental scenarios were designed to simulate a vegetable field and to evaluate the smart sprayer’s performance. The first scenario contained artificial weeds (targets) and artificial plants (non-targets). The second and most challenging scenario contained real plants; portulaca weeds as targets, and sedge weeds and pepper plants as non-targets. Two different embedded graphics processing unit (GPU) were evaluated as the smart sprayer processing unit (for image processing and target detection). The more powerful GPU (NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti) achieved an overall precision of 71% and recall of 78% (for plant detection and target spraying accuracy) on the most challenging scenario with real plants, and 91% accuracy and recall for the first scenario with artificial plants. The less powerful GPU (NVIDIA Jetson TX2) achieved an overall precision and recall of 90% and 89% respectively on the first scenario with artificial plants, and 59% and 44% respectively on the second scenario with real plants. Finally, an RTK GPS was connected to the smart sprayer and an algorithm was developed to automatically generate weed maps and visualize the collected data (after every application). This smart technology integrates a state of the art (AI-based) weed detection system, a novel fast and precision spraying system, and a weed mapping system. It can significantly reduce the quantity of agrochemicals required, especially compared with traditional broadcast sprayers that usually treat the entire field, resulting in unnecessary application to areas that do not require treatment. It could also reduce costs, risk of crop damage and excess herbicide residue, as well as potentially reduce environmental impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate
Deutsch, C. A., Tewksbury, J. J., Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Merrill, S. C., Huey, R. B., & Naylor, R. L. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat3466 · Cited by 1,549
Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
Pretty, J., & Bharucha, Z. (2015) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects6010152 · Cited by 675
Balafoutis, A., Beck, B., Fountas, S., Vangeyte, J., Wal, T., Soto, I., Gómez-Barbero, M., Barnes, A., & Eory, V. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9081339 · Cited by 672
Toward a Reduced Reliance on Conventional Pesticides in European Agriculture
Lamichhane, J. R., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S., Kudsk, P., & Messéan, A. (2016) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis-05-15-0574-fe · Cited by 440
Economic Value of Biological Control in Integrated Pest Management of Managed Plant Systems
Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., & Frisvold, G. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021005 · Cited by 406
Herbicide‐resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides
Owen, M. D., & Zelaya, I. A. (2005) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1015 · Cited by 394
Introduction to Integrated Pest Management
Flint, M. L., & van den Bosch, R. (1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9212-9 · Cited by 325
The Value of Herbicides in U.S. Crop Production
Gianessi, L. P., & Reigner, N. P. (2007) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1614/wt-06-130.1 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Talaviya, T., Shah, D., Patel, N., Yagnik, H., & Shah, M. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002 · Cited by 915
A survey of deep learning techniques for weed detection from images
Hasan, A. S. M. M., Sohel, F., Diepeveen, D., Laga, H., & Jones, M. G. K. (2021) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106067 · Cited by 478
Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061 · Cited by 315
Applications of deep learning in precision weed management: A review
Rai, N., Zhang, Y., Ram, B. G., Schumacher, L., Yellavajjala, R. K., Bajwa, S., & Sun, X. (2023) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2023.107698 · Cited by 218
Mohan, H. M., Anitha, S., Chai, R., & Ling, S. H. (2021) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2021/6483003 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Partel, V., Charan Kakarla, S., & Ampatzidis, Y.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 157
- Pages
- 339-350
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2908783980
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 27.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and evaluation of a low-cost and smart technology for precision weed management utilizing artificial intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.048
- The paper
- Partel, V., Charan Kakarla, S., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2019). Development and evaluation of a low-cost and smart technology for precision weed management utilizing artificial intelligence. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.