The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taking stock of herbicide‐resistant crops ten years after introduction
Abstract
Since transgenic, bromoxynil‐resistant cotton and glufosinate‐resistant canola were introduced in 1995, planting of transgenic herbicide‐resistant crops has grown substantially, revolutionizing weed management where they have been available. Before 1995, several commercial herbicide‐resistant crops were produced by biotechnology through selection for resistance in tissue culture. However, non‐transgenic herbicide‐resistant crops have had less commercial impact. Since the introduction of glyphosate‐resistant soybean in 1996, and the subsequent introduction of other glyphosate‐resistant crops, where available, they have taken a commanding share of the herbicide‐resistant crop market, especially in soybean, cotton and canola. The high level of adoption of glyphosate‐resistant crops by North American farmers has helped to significantly reduce the value of the remaining herbicide market. This has resulted in reduced investment in herbicide discovery, which may be problematic for addressing future weed‐management problems. Introduction of herbicide‐resistant crops that can be used with selective herbicides has apparently been hindered by the great success of glyphosate‐resistant crops. Evolution of glyphosate‐resistant weeds and movement of naturally resistant weed species into glyphosate‐resistant crop fields will require increases in the use of other herbicides, but the speed with which these processes compromise the use of glyphosate alone is uncertain. The future of herbicide‐resistant crops will be influenced by many factors, including alternative technologies, public opinion and weed resistance. Considering the relatively few recent approvals for field testing new herbicide‐resistant crops and recent decisions not to grow glyphosate‐resistant sugarbeet and wheat, the introduction and adoption of herbicide‐resistant crops during the next 10 years is not likely to be as dramatic as in the past 10 years. Published in 2005 for SCI by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Williams, G. M., Kroes, R., & Munro, I. C. (2000) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/rtph.1999.1371 · Cited by 864
Retracted
Cited by
The Current Status and Environmental Impacts of Glyphosate‐Resistant Crops: A Review
Cerdeira, A. L., & Duke, S. O. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0378 · Cited by 393
Self-citationRecent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management
Harker, K. N., & O'Donovan, J. T. (2013) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1614/wt-d-12-00109.1 · Cited by 358
Vencill, W. K., Nichols, R. L., Webster, T. M., Soteres, J. K., Mallory-Smith, C., Burgos, N. R., Johnson, W. G., & McClelland, M. R. (2012) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-d-11-00206.1 · Cited by 309
Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
Green, J. M., & Owen, M. D. K. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101286h · Cited by 301
Herbicidal inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis and herbicide-tolerant crops
Tan, S., Evans, R., & Singh, B. (2006) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-005-0254-1 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Duke, S. O.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-19
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-218
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2043830275
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taking stock of herbicide‐resistant crops ten years after introduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1024
- The paper
- Duke, S. O. (2005). Taking stock of herbicide‐resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.