The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
Open accessAbstract
Since 1996, genetically modified herbicide-resistant (HR) crops, particularly glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, have transformed the tactics that corn, soybean, and cotton growers use to manage weeds. The use of GR crops continues to grow, but weeds are adapting to the common practice of using only glyphosate to control weeds. Growers using only a single mode of action to manage weeds need to change to a more diverse array of herbicidal, mechanical, and cultural practices to maintain the effectiveness of glyphosate. Unfortunately, the introduction of GR crops and the high initial efficacy of glyphosate often lead to a decline in the use of other herbicide options and less investment by industry to discover new herbicide active ingredients. With some exceptions, most growers can still manage their weed problems with currently available selective and HR crop-enabled herbicides. However, current crop management systems are in jeopardy given the pace at which weed populations are evolving glyphosate resistance. New HR crop technologies will expand the utility of currently available herbicides and enable new interim solutions for growers to manage HR weeds, but will not replace the long-term need to diversify weed management tactics and discover herbicides with new modes of action. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of anticipated weed management options and the best management practices that growers need to implement in HR crops to maximize the long-term benefits of current technologies and reduce weed shifts to difficult-to-control and HR weeds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Status of Commercialized biotech/GM crops
James, C. L. R. (2006) · Cited by 1,708
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-4389 · Cited by 724
Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri
Gaines, T. A., Zhang, W., Wang, D., Bukun, B., Chisholm, S. T., Shaner, D. L., Nissen, S. J., Patzoldt, W. L., Tranel, P. J., Culpepper, A. S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906649107 · Cited by 648
Evolved glyphosate‐resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt
Powles, S. B. (2008) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1525 · Cited by 499
Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., & Preston, C. (1998) · Weed Science · doi:10.1017/s0043174500091165 · Cited by 465
Modern Crop Protection Compounds
(2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527619580 · Cited by 420
Baerson, S. R., Rodriguez, D. J., Tran, M., Feng, Y., Biest, N. A., & Dill, G. M. (2002) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.001560 · Cited by 358
Discovery and Directed Evolution of a Glyphosate Tolerance Gene
Castle, L. A., Siehl, D. L., Gorton, R., Patten, P. A., Chen, Y. H., Bertain, S., Cho, H.-J., Duck, N., Wong, J., Liu, D., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1096770 · Cited by 328
Perspectives on Glyphosate Resistance
Bradshaw, L. D., Padgette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., & Wells, B. H. (1997) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1017/s0890037x00041567 · Cited by 317
Rapid vacuolar sequestration: the horseweed glyphosate resistance mechanism
Ge, X., d'Avignon, D. A., Ackerman, J. J., & Sammons, R. D. (2010) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1911 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate
Van Bruggen, A. H. C., He, M. M., Shin, K., Mai, V., Jeong, K. C., Finckh, M. R., & Morris, J. G. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309 · Cited by 992
Yang, S. H., Kim, E., Park, H., & Koo, Y. (2022) · Applied Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1186/s13765-022-00679-w · Cited by 49
(GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O. (2011) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2480 · Cited by 19
(GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O. (2012) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2753 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, J. M., & Owen, M. D. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-06-29
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5819-5829
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2037829345
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 14.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf101286h
- The paper
- Green, J. M., & Owen, M. D. K. (2011). Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf101286h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.