The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glyphosate‐resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glyphosate‐resistant crops (GRCs) were first introduced in the United States in soybeans in 1996. Adoption has been very rapid in soybeans and cotton since introduction and has grown significantly in maize in recent years. GRCs have grown to over 74 million hectares in five crop species in 13 countries. The intent of this paper is to update the hectares planted and the use patterns of GRC globally, and to discuss briefly future applications and uses of the technology. RESULTS: The largest land areas of GRCs are occupied by soybean (54.2 million ha), maize (13.2 million ha), cotton (5.1 million ha), canola (2.3 million ha) and alfalfa (0.1 million ha). Currently, the USA, Argentina, Brazil and Canada have the largest plantings of GRCs. Herbicide use patterns would indicate that over 50% of glyphosate‐resistant (GR) maize hectares and 70% of GR cotton hectares receive alternative mode‐of‐action treatments, while approximately 25% of GR soybeans receive such a treatment in the USA. Alternative herbicide use is likely driven by both agronomic need and herbicide resistance limitations in certain GR crops such as current GR cotton. Tillage practices in the USA indicate that > 65% of GR maize hectares, 70% of GR cotton hectares and 50% of GR soybean hectares received some tillage in the production system. Tillage was likely used for multiple purposes ranging from seed‐bed preparation to weed management. CONCLUSION: GRCs represent one of the more rapidly adopted weed management technologies in recent history. Current use patterns would indicate that GRCs will likely continue to be a popular weed management choice that may also include the use of other herbicides to complement glyphosate. Stacking with other biotechnology traits will also give farmers the benefits and convenience of multiple pest control and quality trait technologies within a single seed. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide
Duke, S. O., & Powles, S. B. (2008) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1518 · Cited by 1,749
Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects
Kumar, K., Gambhir, G., Dass, A., Tripathi, A. K., Singh, A., Jha, A. K., Yadava, P., Choudhary, M., & Rakshit, S. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8 · Cited by 528
Vencill, W. K., Nichols, R. L., Webster, T. M., Soteres, J. K., Mallory-Smith, C., Burgos, N. R., Johnson, W. G., & McClelland, M. R. (2012) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-d-11-00206.1 · Cited by 309
Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
Green, J. M., & Owen, M. D. K. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101286h · Cited by 301
Prevalence of sporadic insect pests of seedling corn and factors affecting risk of infestation
Sappington, T. W., Hesler, L. S., Allen, K. C., Luttrell, R. G., & Papiernik, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Integrated Pest Management · doi:10.1093/jipm/pmx020 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Dill, G. M., CaJacob, C. A., & Padgette, S. R.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-14
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 326-331
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2057698332
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glyphosate‐resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1501
- The paper
- Dill, G. M., CaJacob, C. A., & Padgette, S. R. (2008). Glyphosate‐resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.