The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide
Abstract
Since its commercial introduction in 1974, glyphosate [N‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine] has become the dominant herbicide worldwide. There are several reasons for its success. Glyphosate is a highly effective broad‐spectrum herbicide, yet it is very toxicologically and environmentally safe. Glyphosate translocates well, and its action is slow enough to take advantage of this. Glyphosate is the only herbicide that targets 5‐enolpyruvyl‐shikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), so there are no competing herbicide analogs or classes. Since glyphosate became a generic compound, its cost has dropped dramatically. Perhaps the most important aspect of the success of glyphosate has been the introduction of transgenic, glyphosate‐resistant crops in 1996. Almost 90% of all transgenic crops grown worldwide are glyphosate resistant, and the adoption of these crops is increasing at a steady pace. Glyphosate/glyphosate‐resistant crop weed management offers significant environmental and other benefits over the technologies that it replaces. The use of this virtually ideal herbicide is now being threatened by the evolution of glyphosate‐resistant weeds. Adoption of resistance management practices will be required to maintain the benefits of glyphosate technologies for future generations. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Williams, G. M., Kroes, R., & Munro, I. C. (2000) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/rtph.1999.1371 · Cited by 864
RetractedDuke, S. O., Rimando, A. M., Pace, P. F., Reddy, K. N., & Smeda, R. J. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf025908i · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Cited by
Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally
Benbrook, C. M. (2016) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 · Cited by 1,890
“John Franz, identified the herbicidal activity of glyphosate in 1970, and a formulated end-use product called Roundup was first sold commercially by Monsanto in 1974 [2].”
BackgroundGlyphosate perturbs the gut microbiota of honey bees
Motta, E. V. S., Raymann, K., & Moran, N. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803880115 · Cited by 702
Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide
Heap, I., & Duke, S. O. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4760 · Cited by 518
Self-citationZhu, X., Li, B., Yang, J., Li, Y., Zhao, W., Shi, J., & Gu, J. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am5059074 · Cited by 486
Tarazona, J. V., Court-Marques, D., Tiramani, M., Reich, H., Pfeil, R., Istace, F., & Crivellente, F. (2017) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Duke, S. O., & Powles, S. B.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-13
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 319-325
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W1980243607
- Cited by
- 1,749
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1518
- The paper
- Duke, S. O., & Powles, S. B. (2008). Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.